March 10, 2021

Soft, political "launch" of Indian DRDO's AIP milestone.

There has been much hype since March 9, 2021, concerning a milestone reached in Indian DRDO's (NMRL's) new air independent propulsion (AIP) technology for submarines. But this is more a "soft" political "launch" to legitimise high funding involved, rather than a "hard" launch of a mature weapons system.

Proof whether this AIP is efficient or safe will require 2 or 3 years of at-sea testing. India may develop this AIP into a viable at-sea system, so this is not to denigrate or dismiss India's achievement.

India's defence establishment has been talking about DRDO AIP (scroll 1/4th way down here) since at least 2014. It must be remembered that Russia, Spain and France have been trying to develop successful second generation AIP for years - without proven at-sea progress. 

On March 9, 2021 DRDO announced:

"DRDO achieved an important milestone in the development of AIP System by proving the land based prototype [artwork below] on 8 March 2021. The plant was operated in endurance mode and max power mode as per user requirements. AIP system is being developed by NMRL DRDO." .


Artwork (Courtesy DRDO - on Twitter here.)
 ---

This AIP might first be fitted into the Naval Group Scorpene variant INS Kalvari, during a scheduled, major overhaul, in 2023 (but that may slip to 2024-25). The AIP will then, probably need 2 to 3 years of at-sea testing before it can be proven efficient and safe.

The AIP technology in question is called Phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFC) with power output listed as "250kW...14 days of underwater endurance" and on July 2, 2020 by Defence Decode as 270kW, which compares well with a TKMS Type 214's AIP producing 240kW. Although operating DRDO's AIP at 270kW might consume Hydrogen and LOx propellents overly quickly to be practical - so high end running may only occur in tactical emergencies.

However there is no indication that explosive Hydrogen storage on is outside the pressure hull (a safety measure on the TKMS Type 212). Its unclear whether Type 214s or Dolphin IIs, in general, have there Hydrogen stored outside the pressure hull?


Model: "Defence Decode, July 2, 2020" carries the caption. "Indigenously developed Air independent propulsion by DRDO, through its NMRL Larsen & Toubro as a development partner (LEAD SYSTEM INTEGRATED). The AIP system is based on Indigenously developed PAFC based technology. Hydrogen and Oxygen are supplied to fuel cells to produce power."

The whole apparatus (see Model above) which will lengthen the sub from 67.6m to 77.6m looks very large (judging by the human dolls for scale) and heavy (perhaps 250 tonnes). When this is retrofitted to the Kalvari class there may be major buoyancy readjustments necessary. Many rearrangements (eg. batteries, solid ballast and air/water/diesel tanks) to rebalance the submarine, may be necessary. A big job for Naval Group and the Indian design and build companies involved.

So this is not to denigrate or dismiss India's achievement. But it will likely take 5 to 8 more years for this DRDO AIP to be fully tested and ready in the operational, at-sea environment.

11 comments:

GhalibKabir said...

https://delhidefencereview.com/2017/10/07/indian-navy-looks-forward-to-drdos-air-independent-propulsion-system-for-submarines/

It is most likely between 200-300 tons in terms of weight and as per the makers, neutrally buoyant when added as a 'plug-in' section. Last time DCNS rejected integration as the PAFC was not mature yet and not on weight or buoyancy grounds.

I think considering the pakistani navy has integrated the 300-310 ton MESMA on the Agosta-90s with no issues, again as a plug-in, implies, I don't think integration and buoyancy are issues...The U212, Yuan 39, 877 Kilo and Asashio all seem to have AIP section 5.6 to 8-10 m long...India's AIP matched Asashio's AIP section length of 10 m. possibly Asashio's Stirling AIP was in excess of 300 tons similar to MESMA.

The bigger worry is that PAFC operates in excess of 170 C heat and if not plugged in as a proven technology, can cause accidents...as rightly pointed out by DCNS in 2017. The fuel cell provides for silent operation and is quite efficient, but the heat and the corrosive phosphoric acid makes it a very dangerous proposition especially with water involved.

Now that NMRL and L&T have proved a fixed bed PAFC, they might test it in 2024-2025 on INS Kalvari when it comes in for a refit...that is 3-4 years away and hopefully a few more tons get lopped off by then.


PS: good reads ---> https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA428713.pdf
https://www.engr.colostate.edu/~marchese/mech337-10/epri.pdf
https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/320805

Anonymous said...

Pete

How they access to hydrogen? Development of hydrogen source and supply system is key issue of fuel cell for submarine.

Regards

Pete said...

Hi GhalibKabir
@Mar 10, 2021, 7:41:00 PM

Thanks for https://delhidefencereview.com/2017/10/07/indian-navy-looks-forward-to-drdos-air-independent-propulsion-system-for-submarines/ It quoting 250kW output and 2 weeks fully submerged is very informative.

"It is most likely between 200-300 tons in terms of weight and as per the makers, neutrally buoyant when added as a 'plug-in' section." Also noting DCNS (now Navel Group) successfully helped Pak Navy plug-in MESMA (1st Gen AIP) for Pak's 3 Agosta 90Bs. As yoou say "300-310 ton MESMA".

Japanese ingenuity permitted KHI/MHI Oyahio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyashio-class_submarine non-AIP subs to length just 2.3m (from 81.7m to 84m) to become Soryu subs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C5%8Dry%C5%AB-class_submarine with Stirling AIP.

May be likely DRDO (2021-2024) will build an in-water test rig to test the heat signature and safety aspects before plugging into INS Kalvari in 2024. And continue testing on INS Kalvari during and after refit.

Thanks for https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA428713.pdf
https://www.engr.colostate.edu/~marchese/mech337-10/epri.pdf
https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/320805 for experts.

Regards

Pete

Pete said...

Hi Anonymous [at Mar 11, 2021, 10:04:00 AM]

Re your question "How they access to hydrogen? Development of hydrogen source and supply system is key issue of fuel cell for submarine."

The long answer is at https://delhidefencereview.com/2017/10/07/indian-navy-looks-forward-to-drdos-air-independent-propulsion-system-for-submarines/

Short answer - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphoric_acid_fuel_cell DRDO especially the diagram.

DRDO's Phosphoric acid fuel cell (PAFC) is a type of fuel cell that uses liquid phosphoric acid (H3PO4) (once freed from its silicon carbide matrix (by a small electrical current??)

combines with Oxygen (stored as liquid oxygen - in the big tank) to produce a higher amount of electrical power

passed into battteries or directly into electrical motor to provide electricity to run (or top up) all of the subs electrical needs (Hotel load) and propulsion.

NOTE: I bow to more chemically/electrically minded experts to explain this better to Anonymous :)

Cheers

Pete

Anonymous said...

As a reference for comment (Mar 10, 2021, 7:41:00 PM)

JS Asashio, 7th ship of Harushio class submarine was improved by installing of AIP for testing of Stirling generators [1], and then resulted in significant increase in displacement and length as follows.

Standard displacement: 2560t to 2900t (AIP)
Full displacement: 3200t to 3700t (AIP)
Length: 78.0m to 87.0m (AIP)

[1] https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%82%E3%81%95%E3%81%97%E3%81%8A_(%E6%BD%9C%E6%B0%B4%E8%89%A6%E3%83%BB2%E4%BB%A3)

Pete said...

Hi Anonymous [at Mar 11, 2021, 2:25:00 PM]

Thanks for filling in the details for JS Asashio, 7th sub of the Harushio class used as the test sub for the future upgrade to Swedish provided Stirling AIP. This was a technology which became fully operational in the eventual Soryu class.

JS Asashio's specs:

Standard displacement: 2560t to 2900t (AIP)
Full displacement: 3200t to 3700t (AIP)
Length: 78.0m to 87.0m (AIP)

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%82%E3%81%95%E3%81%97%E3%81%8A_(%E6%BD%9C%E6%B0%B4%E8%89%A6%E3%83%BB2%E4%BB%A3)

Pete Comment: JS Asashio was commissioned March 12, 1997 SS-589 when operational. Re-designated TSS-3601 ("T" for "training" but at times can be code for "technology testbed"). Finally decommissioned on February 27, 2017.

Regards

Pete

Anonymous said...

Hi Anonymous
at Mar 11, 2021, 10:04:00 AM

In answer to your question, the sodium borohydride is the source of the hydrogen in DRDO's PAFC AIP.

Anonymous said...

Hi Pete

Hydrogen for electrochemical reaction in PAFC seems to be produced by liquid phase reaction of sodium borohydride [1, 2]. Then, DRDO submarine might equip with reservoir (tanks or cylinders) for aqueous borohydride solution..

[1] https://web.iitd.ac.in/~sbasu/seminar/presentation/3S.R.ChoudhuryNMRL,DRDO%20mbernath.pdf
page 45/62 “Hydrogen generator for small fuel cells” Based on catalytic cracking of alkaline NaBH4(=sodium borohydride).

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_borohydride
Hydrogen source (=sodium borohydride)
The hydrogen is generated for a fuel cell by catalytic decomposition of the aqueous borohydride solution.

Regards

Pete said...

Thanks Anonymous [at Mar 12, 2021, 10:05:00 AM]

For the explanation of the DRDO AIP process and those sources.

- https://web.iitd.ac.in/~sbasu/seminar/presentation/3S.R.ChoudhuryNMRL,DRDO%20mbernath.pdf
page 45/62 looks like the ultimate detailed DRDO NMRL slide explanation of the AIP process.

and for

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_borohydride

This should help Anonymous [at Mar 11, 2021, 10:04:00 AM] in his/her question.

Regards

Pete

Anonymous said...

Hi Pete

In DRDO AIP, 40w/% Sodium borohydride solution is used for hydrogen source, and this system might produce 5-6 times more hydrogen released per gram than for metal hydrides.

Regards

Pete said...

Thanks Anonymous [at Mar 13, 2021, 7:16:00 PM]

In your explanation of the DRDO AIP hydrogen source.

Regards

Pete