Following Submarine Matters’ article of November 5, 2019 there is still
little published information on South Korea’s (SK’s) lithium-ion batteries (LIBs)
for submarine use. To partly fill the gap Anonymous has provided likely
estimates and links below.
Significant estimates for
SK LIB include dimensions of battery modules and total price of the SK LIBs
producer SAMSUG SDI battery modules for the DSME 2000 and KSS-III Batch 2
submarines. This is based on the video and other data - see [1] and [2] below.
DSME 2000 and KSS-III
Batch 2 submarines will be equipped with the
same battery tray, but, the number and total energy of battery trays will be different.
2,200 ton DSME 2000s will have 128 trays producing total energy of 8.6 MWh.
While 3,700 ton (submerged) KSS-III Batch 2s will have 192 trays producing 12.9 MWh).
SK LIBs price per unit
power [measured in US$/Wh] is quite low and may be cheaper than lead-acid
batteries (LABs). That is a ratio of
US$0.3 for a SAMSUNG SDI LIB cell compared to US$0.69 for a Japanese GS-YUASA
LAB cell. Meanwhile a Japanese GS-YUASA LIB cell (developed for Japan’s Soryu
subs) may cost US$1.61. From the viewpoint of cost, DSME 2000 may be serious export
competition to the TKMS Type 214, SAAB A26 and Naval Group Scorpene.
(above and below) LIBs in yellow can be seen on these future DSME 2000 submarine models. (Above courtesy Naval News and Below courtesy IHS Markit/M Boruah )
[1] Assumptions
As the LIBs market for
submarines is extremely small, SAMSUM SDI will use existing battery modules and
cells of proven reliability.
Use a standard battery
trays in future DSME 2000s and KSS-III Batch 2s reduces costs.
Battery trays arrangements
in the battery section of DSME 2000s is 8 rows x 8 columns and in the KSS-III
Batch 2s it is 12 rows x 8 columns. Such arrangements minimize stray magnetic
fields.
Dimensions (W x D x H in
mm) of battery trays are from 500 x 300 x 900 to around 600 x 400 x 1200.
A battery tray consists of 8 battery modules. A battery module in turn consists of 12 cells.
The price per
submarine of LABs is around US$137 million and if it were to have LIBs the
price currently is around US$780 million (or 85 Billion Japanese Yen). Cost of
LIBs is currently very high as they are new, rare and still include high development
costs portions in their overall price. Costs would also include extensive computer control for safety. But LIBs have many advantages (longer
lasting between recharges, faster and deeper charging by diesel engines, and SK
LIBs will have about twice as many cycles (4,000) compared to LABs (2,000). The price of battery trays are more
expensive than the sum of their cells.
[2] Possible battery
module and cell
A SAMSUNG SDI Battery
module used for submarine may be designated M8994
E2. See the specifications and small diagram of the M8994 E2, under the subheading
“2016 module” by scrolling about half way down http://www.samsungsdi.com/upload/ess_brochure/Samsung%20SDI%20brochure_EN.pdf
Note Energy quoted is 8.39kWh, Dimensions
370 x 588 x 160mm, weight <60kg span="">. 60kg>
Does the SAMSUNG SDI LIBs for submarine use the
chemical formula Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (LiNiMnCoO2) abbreviated
NMC? Such a cell is the SAMSUNG
94 Ah. see https://pushevs.com/2017/02/20/details-samsung-sdi-94-ah-battery-cell/
where Energy is 350Wh, Dimensions 173x125x45mm, weight 2kg, price 162.69€,
Scrolling a fifth way
down https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/types_of_lithium_ion
at “Figure 7: Snapshot of NMC” you will see NMC has a good balance of characteristics,
ie: Specific Energy, Specific Power, Safety, Performance, Life span and Cost.
Battery tray. Estimated
specification of tray consisted of eight layers of M8994 E2 with dimensions (W
x D x H in mm) = 588 x 370 x 1280.
Calculation of energy of KSS-III
Batch 2 is 8.39kWh (energy of M8994 E2) x 8 (layers of M8994 E2 in a battery
tray) x (12 x 8) (row and column of battery tray) x 2 (battery sections) =
12.88MWh.
DSME, SAMSUNG SDI, GS-YUASA and any other readers are invited to correct, fill-in and thereby expand public knowledge on specifications of LIBs for submarines and comparison with LABs.
4 comments:
Interesting energy technologies of KSS-III Batch2 submarine are as follows.
1 LIBs
NMC is Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (LiNiMnCoO2).
Experimental and estimates cycle lives of SAMSUNG SDI 94Ah battery cell are 3600 (red circles) and 4600 cycles (red dotted line, capacity 80%), respectively. 120Ah will be achieved soon [1].
Total energy of DSME 2000 and KSS-III Batch2 submarines using 94Ah/111Ah/120Ah battery cells are 8.6/10.1/11.0MWh and 12.9/15.2/16.4 MWh, respectively.
2 Propulsion motor [2]
Propulsion motors are consisted of two motors (blue big one, silver small one) connected directly each other. This system is different from Siemens PERMASYN (SIEMENS) and MAGTONIC (Jeumont Electric). Only small motor rotates at low speed, and two motors rotate at middle/high speed.
3 Diesels [2]
Appearance of diesel is different from 12PA4 V200 SMDS (MAN Diesel & Turbo) where positions of compressor and generator are different, MTU 12V 4000 U83 which has twin turbos, and DM-185 (UDMZ). Does South Korea succeed new diesel for submarine?
4 Hydrogen sources: patent issue.
As SIEMENS has patent of metal hydride as hydrogen sources, application of metal hydride seems to be difficult without permission (=money) by SIEMENS. Another hydrogen sources such carbon nanotube might be applied, but there are still patent barriers.
[1]
https://insideevs.com/news/338067/bmw-i3-samsung-sdi-94-ah-battery-rated-for-524000-miles/
“Samsung SDI is presenting at the 2018 Energy Storage Europe in Germany its latest high-energy density 111 Ah battery cells for energy storage purposes along with its 94 Ah cells used in all-electric cars.” And, page5/5, Figure “Samsun 94Ah battery cells”
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWIBOmw9VRQ&feature=youtu.be
06:53/12:40
Hi Pete,
Off topic
Part one report on the collision on 8 November 2018 between the frigate HNoMS Helge Ingstad and the oil tanker Sola TS outside the Sture Terminal in the Hjeltefjord in Hordaland county
In this link there is a video from the tanker of the collision.
/Kjell
Hi /Kjell
Thanks for Part one report on the collision on 8 November 2018 between the Norwegian frigate Helge Ingstad and the oil tanker Sola TS outside the Sture Terminal in the Hjeltefjord, Norway at https://www.aibn.no/Sjofart/Avgitte-rapporter/2019-08-eng
By scrolling a third way down https://www.tu.no/artikler/her-er-konklusjonene-fra-havarikommisjonens-rapport-om-knm-helge-ingstad/478525 readers will see the 2nd video is from the tanker showing Helge Ingstad colliding. Lots of sparks as Helge Ingstad's stern hull is pierced.
My take on this is that overall the reports show mainly Helge Ingstad crew and procedures were in the wrong with lesser blame on tanker crew and shore authorities.
Regards
Pete
Thanks Anonymous
I have published your November 8, 2019 at 4:58PM comment as an article at https://gentleseas.blogspot.com/2019/11/further-estimated-propulsion-details.html of November 13, 2019.
Regards
Pete
Post a Comment