Showing posts with label ATV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ATV. Show all posts

March 3, 2015

Latest on India's Aircraft Carrier Projects



India's old and new aircraft carriers. Image courtesy of The Times of India, February 23, 2015
--------

INS Vikrant "2" on launch November 2014. Photo courtesy.
---

India is gradually expanding its carrier force. India may have 2 carriers by 2019. Whether both will be fully commisioned then is a question mark. Basically India may be maintaining parity with China's slowly emerging carrier capability. Major  commissioned. 

Major milestones are:  

2016 - expected retirement of INS Viraat. It was acquired from UK 1987 – 28,000 tons displacement, 11 Sea Harriers.
2016 - INS Vikramaditya rebuilt and handed over by Russia 2013. It will be India’s only commissioned carrier for 3 - 4 years after INS Viraat is decommissioned. 45,000 tons, 24 MiG-29Ks.
2019 - INS Vikrant "2" India’s first indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC-I), launched 2014, under construction 2016-17. Perhaps commissioned by 2019. 40,000 tons, 12 MiG-29Ks, 8 Tejas light combat aircraft (LCA). Construction of Vikrant has already been delayed by four years with repeated technical and budgetary issues. The "2" is sometimes informally used as Google searches simply for "INS Vikrant" often turn up the preceding INS Vikrant that was decommissioned in 1997.
2030 - INS Vishal (may be completed 2030) known as indigenous aircraft carrier-II (IAC-II), maybe nuclear propelled, 65,000 ton (displacement equal to China’s carrier Liaoning). May feature Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) being developed by the US for its new Ford class supercarriers. EMALs would allow full sized carrier aircraft, like the Super Hornet, to be launched. Vikramaditya’s and Vikrant’s ski-jumps only allow up to MiG-29 weight aircraft. If a successful design Vishal may be the first of class for 2 to 3 more 65,000 ton carriers (perhaps around 2035-2040) allowing Vikramaditya to retire.
India, like Russia, US, and even Australia often under-estimate the costs and build time of weapons systems. Politicians, bureaucrats, military officers and arms builders all can underestimate the cost-length-complexity of their projects. The main aim appears to be placating the public and Treasuries whose tax-payer dollars go into paying for weapons systems. 
Please connect with Submarine Matter's:


also connect with other recent sources:


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-now-puts-aircraft-carrier-plan-on-fast-track/articleshow/46336472.cms


Artist's conception of INS Vikrant "2" - indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC-I)
---

Pete

May 1, 2012

Indian Submarines Chakra & the ATVs Make Progress

As at Aug 27, 2008


2 Russian Akula IIs - similar (perhaps) to the final form of INS Chakra


Likely Plan of India's Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) which may be launched next year. This ".jpg" image originated here.
-
-
On August 21, 2008, a confusing article from India Today stated (paragraphs reorganised to attempt to provide clarity):
-
INS Chakra - Modified Akula II
-
"India's strategic establishment has begun the countdown to two important milestones. In late June, a modified Akula-II class nuclear-powered attack submarine, the Chakra, began harbour acceptance trials at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur shipyard [inland about 1,000 kms northeast of Vladivostok] in the Russian far east.
-
The Chakra is the Russian submarine, formerly [commissioned Nerpa in December 2000], which in the next few months will to sail into the Pacific Ocean off Vladivostok for full-fledged sea trials with a Russian crew.
-
If the trials are successfully concluded, say officials, the Chakra will be commissioned at Vladivostok with an Indian crew who will sail it to India by August 15, 2009.
-
Due to its design commonality with ATV, the Chakra is being leased primarily to train crews to man ATVs. With its cruise missiles and torpedoes, it will also be used for sea-denial missions [maybe] in the Indian Ocean.
-
The under construction 12,000-tonne Chakra was to be completed and leased to India for 10 years under a $650-million deal signed in 2004. It was to be inducted into the navy on August 15 this year, but was delayed by a year, following technical snags."Project India", as the classified lease programme is called, seems to be back on track after being seemingly caught in last year's freeze in Indo-Russian defence ties over escalating costs of the aircraft carrier Vikramaditya's [ex-Gorshkov] refit.
-
Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) - Modified Akula I
-
On January 26, 2009, the sluice gates of an enclosed dry-dock in Visakhapatnam [naval base on India's east coast] are to be opened and the world will take its first look at India's first nuclear-powered submarine, the Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV), as it enters the waters. [complete fitout, testing, crew training may take 4 or 5 years before the first ATV is operational].
-
...The aim is to field three [ATV] submarines equipped with nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles-the so-called third leg of the nuclear triad comprising air, land and sea-launched weapons-on "deterrent patrols" (to deter a potential adversary from launching a nuclear first strike) by 2015.
-
India's ATV is based on the Russian Akula I class [first launched 1986] submarine, but is powered by a single indigenously-built nuclear reactor and equipped with 12 K-15 ballistic missiles or 16 of the Indo-Russian BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles.
-Background
-
naval-technology.com provides the most comprehensive description of the Akula I's and II's that I've seen:
-
Data for Akula II:
-
Crew 73
Surfaced Displacement 8,140t
Displacement, Submerged 12,770t
Overall Height 11.3m
Hull Cross Section 13.6m x 9.68m
Diving Depth 600m
Run Speed Surfaced 10kt

Speed Submerged 35kt
-
Full Specifications
-
The Russian Navy has 14 Bars Class project 971 submarines known in the West as the Akula Class nuclear-powered missile attack submarines (SSN). A unknown number of Russian Akula class submarines are deployed in the Pacific and (perhaps) Indian Ocean region.
-
The submarines were built by the Amur Shipbuilding Plant Joint Stock Company at Komsomolsk-on-Amur [far eastern Siberia] and at the Severodvinsk shipbuilding yard [near Archangel in nothwestern Russia].

-
Seven Akula I submarines were commissioned between 1986 and 1992, and three Improved Akula between 1992 and 1995.
-
Three Akula II submarines, with hull length extended by 4m and advanced machinery-quietening technology, have been built.

-
[Hence main differences between Akula Is and IIs may be the hull extension and some new equipment.]
-
The first Akula II named Viper, was commissioned in 1995, the second, Nerpa, in December 2000 and the third, Gepard, in August 2001. The Akula II are 110m long and displace up to 12,770t.

-
DESIGN

-
The submarine has a double-hulled configuration with a distinctive high aft fin. The hull has seven compartments and the stand-off distance between the outer and inner hulls is considerable, reducing the possible inner hull damage [due to pressure surges and kinetic punctures?]. The very low acoustic signature has been achieved by incremental design improvements to minimise noise generation and transmission – for example, the installation of active noise cancellation techniques [and the double hull].

-
The retractable masts viewed from bow to stern are the periscopes, radar antennae, radio and satellite communications and navigation masts.

-
MISSILES
-

The Indian fitout is likely to be 16 Indo-Russian BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles first then eventually (say 2015?) replaced or augmented by 12 K-15 ballistic missiles.
The dimensions of the BrahMos missile (8.3 m x 0.6 m) suggest it could[?] be cold launched by torpedo tubes. This would allow eventual simultanous installation of K-15 ballistic missiles and avoid the need to convert vertical launch tubes from BrahMos use to K-15 use.
India test fired a K-15 from a pontoon on February 26, 2008, two-stage, solid fuel, range 700 kms, length 11 metres, 0.7m wide [?]
-
Work on the K-15 started around a decade ago under a highly classified programme earlier called
Sagarika (Oceanic). Development ran parallel to the Indian navy's 25 year programme to build the ATV.
A news report estimated the future K-15 "payload" as 500kg. - Comment received: with a 500kg warhead, the range of the Sagarika will be 1800 km. India finds it convenient to understate the range of its missiles though. Having weaponry that can reach Europe causes diplomatic friction.
-
Regarding yield, the 250 kg warhead (in a 500kg RV for a K-15 ) may be 200-300kT - this is based on better known calculations for the Agni series warheads. The warheads developed for the Prithvi are smaller (20kT) and lighter (<200kg>20kT. For larger yield (200-300kT) they may use thermonuclear designs. It doesn't appear that India has large fission or
Sloika/Joe 4 type designs. These tend to be heavy and difficult to deliver.
-
TORPEDOES
-
The submarine has eight torpedo launch tubes, four 650mm and four 533mm tubes. The Improved Akula and Akula II have ten, with six 533mm tubes. The four 650mm tubes can be fitted with liners to provide additional 533mm weapon launch capacity. The torpedo tubes can be used to launch mines instead of torpedoes. The Akula can launch a range of anti-submarine and anti-surface vessel torpedoes.
-
SENSORS
-

The Akula's surface search radar is the Snoop Pair or the Snoop Half. The surface search radar antennae are installed on the same mast as the Rim Hat radar intercept receiver.
-
The submarine is fitted with the MGK 540 sonar system which provides automatic target detection in broad and narrow-band modes by active sonar. It gives the range, relative bearing and range rate.

-
The sonar system can also be used in a passive, listening mode for detection of hostile sonars. The sonar signal processor can detect and automatically classify targets as well as reject spurious acoustic noise sources and compensate for variable acoustic conditions.
-

PROPULSION
-

[Relevant to Chakra ] The main machinery consists of a VM-5 pressure water reactor rated at 190MW with a GT3A turbine developing 35MW. Two auxiliary diesels rated at 750hp provide emergency power. The propulsion system drives a seven-bladed fixed-pitch propeller.
[The single reactor for the ATV was reported in 2004 to be only 100MWt. Unless it has been uprated (or 2 reactors are now to be used) the ATV may be much smaller than an Akula or much slower.]
-
The propulsion system provides a maximum submerged speed of 33kt and a surface speed of 10kt. A reserve propeller system, powered by two motors rated at 370kW, provides a speed of 3kt to 4kt. The submarine is rated for a diving depth to 600m.
-
Comments
-
The January 2009 viewing of an ATV hull may be strongly influenced by the need for good public relations - showing where the Rs Billions spent on a delayed program have gone. Until the ATV hull can be viewed in its entirety press releases about the ATV cannot be fully accepted. Will it basically be an Akula or a heavily modified boat - perhaps smaller?
-
Complete fitout, testing and crew training may take 4 or 5 years before the first ATV is fully operational and ready to overawe Pakistan or counter China's SSBNs.
-
With the eventual introduction of viable Indian nuclear powered small SSBNs (on top of current Russian and Chinese SSN's and SSBN's) Australia will need to deeply consider whether a conventionally powered Collins class replacement will cut it in a nuclear submarine region.
-
We are not labelling Russia, China or India as friends or enemies. Military planning and acquisitions rely more on comparitive capabilities and needs.
-
If we calculate that America will be by our side for only 25 years then we should go nuclear (propulsion and weapons). If the Australia-US alliance estimate is optimistic - up to 40 years we don't need to think about nuclear for 20 years - maybe, hopefully.
-

January 20, 2012

Hypersonic Missile Research and Doctrine



Artist's conception of HyStrike in flight and internally. This is one hoped for practical product of hypersonic missile research.

On July 11, 2007 I commented on progress of Australia-DARPA "HyCause" hypersonic ramjet research. Something that may now be using results from that research (or working in parallel) is the "HyFly" test series.

From Defence Talk.com, October 6, 2008 came the following:

ST. LOUIS: Boeing has been awarded an $18.3 million follow-on contract from the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to conduct a third powered flight of the HyFly hypersonic missile. HyFly is powered by a Dual Combustion Ramjet (DCR) engine.

"The DCR engine is designed to accelerate HyFly and sustain flight at Mach 6," said Carl Avila, director of Advanced Weapons and Missile Systems for Boeing. "This will be a major step in the development of a weapon system that could revolutionize the military's ability to respond rapidly to time-critical threats hundreds of miles away. It will demonstrate that hypersonic weapons are viable and will put us one step closer to making a high-speed strike weapon available to the warfighter."

This third HyFly test follows two initial flights that, while partially successful, yielded significant data that will be useful in completing a successful test flight. The first flight in September 2007 successfully tested stage separation, inlet cover ejection, and DCR engine ignition. A software error prevented missile acceleration, ending the test.

For the second test in January 2008, HyFly successfully boosted to Mach 3.5. The missile achieved stage separation and inlet cover ejection, but the DCR engine failed to light due to a malfunction in the fuel system unrelated to the engine. HyFly remained under control during the flight and successfully completed a demonstration of terminal guidance accuracy.

Both flights were launched from a Boeing-operated F-15E aircraft over the sea range at the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, Point Mugu, Calif.


Comments

The HyFly project may well by ahead of any hypersonic research being conducted by Russia or France or ahead of any Russian-Indian hypersonic "BrahMos-2" research. 
-
My estimation is that proponents of hypersonic missiles see them (in mainly classified specs) as being used for extremely rapid reaction and short to intermediate range. An early US goal was 700 nautical miles (1,300kms). Further than that ballistic missiles may have the edge.
-
Unlike ballistic missiles hypersonic could be guided by an operator right onto target or (unlike ballistic) exploded or disarmed midair if a decision is made not to hit the target. Alternatively (unlike ballistic but like subsonic) they could be redirected mid flight to different targets.
-
All launch modes, fixed and static, land, sea and air are possible. Of this subs operating close to enemy coasts may be a particularly suitable scenario.
-
For Australia I think hypersonic cruise missiles fired from a future conventional "baby Virginia" sub may be what we'll have by 2030. Australia probably won't be realistic enough to go to nuclear powered subs with small ballistic missiles - but hopefully the upward firing cruise missile launch tubes could be reconfigured to ballistic (like the Indian ATV plans).
-
So in that sense hypersonic may partly be seen as a compromise by "peaceful nations" short of (or before) going ballistic.
-
Unlike ballistic (assumed nuclear if sent by a nuclear power) there is no such assumption that a hypersonic missile will be armed with a nuclear warhead.
-
Just like subsonic cruise missile doctrine shifted from purely nuclear to mixed warhead uses hypersonic may be mixed - although the expectation might lean towards nuclear till experience proves otherwise.
-
The technical difficulties of long distance hypersonic flight are still extreme. They centre on the missile overheating through friction in the dense lower atmosphere. Something for the aerodynamicists and metallurgists to nail by 2012 or so.
-
Pete

July 28, 2009

INS Arihant Launched July 26, 2009

-

-
The most complete photo(?) image (above) of Arihant to date. Courtesy of India Today.
-
-
The slide (above) depicts insides of the Arihant. It is from an Indian Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) powerpoint presentation reproduced by Indian NDTV and other media outlets.

-
Though launched on July 26, 2009 the complete shape of Arihant still appears to be classified (based on the heavy restrictions on photos permitted).
-
There has been much speculation over the last two years about the size and design of India's Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) nuclear sub program. Now the "launching" of the Arihant indicates that the weapons fit is as expected (K-15 then Agni III (K-4)). Early reports were of a Russian Charlie sized ATV 4 - 5,000+ tons. Puzzling and perhaps a pointer to the smaller vessel (for 3 vessels at least) was the 80 MW reactor reported all along. As it turns out India is planning to buld three Arihant Class then two larger SSBNs (carrying 12 Agni IIIs?) perhaps of the Akula II size?. So all in all I suspect our theories were mostly right ;)
-
India's first locally built nuclear submarine (Arihant is Sanskrit for "Slayer of Enemies") was launched on July 26, 2009 at the Naval Dockyard at Visakhapatnam on India's east coast. The hull is complete. The boat is floating. The reactor will be started soon - Indian sources report. The Indian Navy is being rather cautious with their new boat. One report claims the Navy didn't want a media launch but were overruled by the Prime Minister's Office since the PM was under attack for perceived concessions to Pakistan and needed to burnish his national security credentials.
-
The media were not allowed to take photos and they only saw Arihant after it was floated (thus hiding a good portion of the hull (sonar, prop ?) under water. Arihant is being built in a semi enclosed dock to keep it out of view of overhead satellites.
-
The submarine is 110 meter long with an eventual crew of 70-100 men. For its first 3 years of trials 10-20 technicians (mainly Indians but some Russians) are likely to be onboard.
-
Once designated the ATV, INS Arihant is the lead vessel of the class. The second and third submarines of the Arihant Class are due to be launched in 2010 and 2011. The three submarines of the class may be in commission with the Indian Navy by 2015-18.
-
Development
-
The ATV project started with the intent to design nuclear-powered fast attack submarines (SSNs). As nuclear armed nations placed greater reliance on the sea leg (SSBNs) of the nuclear triad and less on the more vulnerable air (bombers) and land legs (fixed silos and mobile launchers) India altered the course of the project towards producing SSBNs.
-
The Plutonium Recyling Project (PRP) at the Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IGCAR) Kalpakkam was a cover name behind which BARC, a facility of the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), built India’s first indigenous submarine Pressurised Water Reactor (PWR). This submarine reactor is in the so called "half boat" hull DAE built for testing prior to building the actual submarine (the Arihant) with an identical reactor. Both the land-test and reactor fitted in Arihant generate around 80 MW, powered by 40% enriched uranium. The relatively low HEU of 40% suggests regular refueling (every 10 years?) might be necessary. The Rare Materials Project (RMP) at Ratnahalli near Mysore, another DAE facility, produced the enriched uranium.
-
The initial version of the land-test reactor ran into technical obstacles and delay after which Russian help was sought to resolve the design glitches during the early 2000s. Significantly Indian Prime Minister Singh at the July 26, 2009, launch thanked “our Russian friends for their consistent and invaluable cooperation, which symbolises the close strategic partnership that we enjoy with Russia”.
-
The hulls for this class are built by L&T's Hazira shipbuilding facility in the state of Gujarat, northwestern India. . Tata Power built the control systems for the submarine. The systems for the steam turbine integrated with the PWR are supplied by Walchandnagar Industries.
-
Future Weapons Fit
-
The Arihant class may possibly be first armed with the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile but more likely it will have 4 tubes, each holding 3 x K-15 "Sagarika" SLBMs, see LAUNCHING PLATFORMS FOR PROJECT K-15 - so the Arihant may first field 12 K-15s. Then eventually one "K-X" SLBM per tube. The K-X is a version under development of the Agni-III IRBM. (hereinafter called the naval Agni III) - so four naval Agni IIIs per Arihant sub.
-
The K-15s will be fired from under water. After the cold launch phase a booster will kick with one or more stages raising it to a 20 km altitude followed by a parabolic path to a target up to 750km distant. The K-15 missiles, developed by the DRDO, are already under production. The DRDO has test-fired them several times from submerged pontoons off the coast of Visakhapatnam. They can carry both conventional and nuclear warheads. They are 10.4 metres tall and weigh 6.3 tonnes each. Their warheads weigh about a 1,000 kg.

The 750 km range K-15 is an interim weapon (vastly shorter range, less throw weight than the Chinese SLBM JL-2) on the way to the naval Agni III). It is the naval Agni III which may be equivalent to the JL-2 but an Arihant will only have 4 naval Agni IIIs.
-
This unique ability of a nuclear submarine to completely conceal itself underwater for up to 6 months will make it the most potent leg in in the nuclear triad. This is especially important given India's declared (though to date theoretical) no-first-use nuclear doctrine (which apparently does not apply to Pakistan). The nuclear submarine will provide a lethal second-strike capability to retaliate against a conceivable first preemptive strike by an enemy (mainly China).
-
The Arihant class hull features twin flank-array sonars and Rafael broadband expendable anti-torpedo countermeasures.
-
After launching of the 3 Arihant Class subs Indian planners envisage development of two SSBN size submarines - probably of similar size (12,000 ton) and design to the Akula II that India is due to lease from Russia early next year.
-
Why has Arihant been officially unveiled now, in such an incomplete condition? Perhaps due to:

- national pride

- the Navy had to show it was getting somewhere. The need of the Indian Navy and weapons development organisations to show the public and politicians where the huge amount of development money, man hours and other resources have gone. Although the submarines were first envisaged in the 1970s ongoing problems, mainly with the reactor, have lead to delays.

- the Indian PM was under attack for perceived concessions to Pakistan and needed to burnish his national security credentials.

- a means of indicating great power status. Only the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (P5) have been able (or permitted) to develop and build nuclear submarines - that is the United States, RussiaFranceBritainChina. India has now forced its way into the nuclear sub owning club on the way to its broader campaign of achieving (P6) membership.

- the India-U.S. nuclear deal represents de facto recognition of India’s nuclear weapons program. This makes the unveiling at this time of a nuclear submarine that will be nuclear armed less politically sensitive.

- probably the most important reason to unveil now is to give the appearance of keeping up with China - to a limited extent. Arihant is a clear sign that India is looking to meet the future regional naval threat from China. The Chinese fleet of 62 submarines, with at least 10 of them nuclear-powered, is on the way to fielding the new JL-2 SLBM.
-
The Chinese JL-2 missile has a strike range of over 7,200 km. When fired by Jin SSBNs from protected Chinese waters (the Jins need protection from highly active US anti-submarine forces) a JL-2 is capable of reaching India and Australia (including Perth and Brisbane). The required range would be 12,000 km to hit the continental US from Chinese protected waters around the SSBN base at Sanya, on Hainan Island, China.
-
Some Extra Points
-
It seems the DAE ran a facility called "Plutonium Recycling Project" that had nothing to do with Plutonium or recycling. With the Arihant launch, they threw open the doors of a facility restricted even to other DAE scientists and let the media take photos. They toured the "half boat" reactor and interviewed Anil Kakodar who stated they were able to build reactors to power future aircraft carriers if the Indian government so requested.
-
The sub design is interesting. Nothing like the Charlie class. In the early 90s, India built two German HDW209 subs at Mazagon docks in Bombay and studied plans for the Project 75 Scorpenes. I think they learned quite a lot from those western boats. There is also a Russian Kilo that has been undergoing mid life refit for half a decade just meters away from the facility where the ATV was assembled. It has been literally cut open. Some speculate that the delay in refit was actually for training ATV-Arihant workmen.
-
The limber slots and sail mounted planes don't look anything like the Akula (of the coming Nerpa/Chakra). Yet the Russian Ambassador to India stated in an interview that the ATV is based on the Akula:
-
A high percentage of Indian arms equipment still has a high Russian content - with Arihant benefitting from Indian access to Western sub technology and those 140 Russian consultants.
-
There is still the Agni SLBM version to be produced and the matter of its range. Given that India has been producing large diameter solid rockets (for its civilian space programme) for a lot longer than China, we may see this missile gap also close.
-
Charting the development of the Arihant Class, particularly its reactor(s) and armament, is an ongoing process. More posts will follow.
-
Pete