The Israeli AIP Dolphin 2 at just over 2,000 tonnes evolved from the HDW 209 and HDW 212. The HDW 218SG is very similar to the Dolphin 2 in length and beam. See model of the 218SG later revealed.
---
---
Where will the Type 218SG fit on this HDW submarine tree?
-------------------------
For the latest on Sweden vs Germany see June 11, 2014’s Australia's Future Submarine - Swedish vs German Claims http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2014/06/australias-future-submarine-swedish-vs.html .
Singapore's Defence Ministry (Mindef) signed the purchase deal with TKMS on November 29, 2013 to buy two the 218SGs. The contract was likely to be worth more than 1 billion euros (US$1.36 billion).
In hindsight this website's November 13, 2013 article http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2013/11/germans-sinking-kockums-swedish-sub.html was an indicator that HDW winning the Singapore order was suspected by the Swedish and German media. Singapore's 218SG decision is clearly a blow to Kockums and to Sweden's Navy (which would rely on foreign sales of Kockums subs to lower unit costs of Kockums subs). Unless the Swedish Government or a Swedish firm buys back Kockums Sweden might be forced to buy its future submarines from HDW or at least TKMS owned Kockums. Also link with Saab Being Subsidized to Buy Back Kockums? of March 4, 2014 http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/saab-being-subsidized-to-buy-back.html .
For Singapore there is some continuity buying customised submarines - from customised Kockums Archer and Challenger Class to customised HDW 218SG class.
I suspect HDW 218SG will be an enlarged evolution of the HDW 209, 212 or 214, perhaps like Israel's HDW built Dolphin 2s. The HDW 218SG may be larger - between 2,000 and 3,000 tons (surfaced) see http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/the-hdw-218sg-probably-3000-tonne.html . Given the expected 218SG delivery date of 2020 it is unlikely that the 218SG would be radically enlarged to 4,000 tonnes (HDW 216 Class). A 4,000 tonne design would probably take longer than the seven years to develop (2013-2020). Also the 218's purchase price of around US$650 million each implies an existing design rather than a radically new 4,000 ton (surfaced) 216 which would be far more expensive.
The two 218SGs, together with two existing Kockums Archer Class submarines, will replace the four ageing Challenger Class submarines, built in the 1960s and acquired by Singapore in the 1990s, which will be progressively retired from service. This follows Singaporean Defence Minister Ng Hen's comments in March 2013 about Mindef's plan to replace the Challenger submarines.
The 218SG contract includes a logistics package and the training of Singaporean crew in Germany. The 218SGs will have significantly improved capabilities including new build fuel cell Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) which significantly increases a submarine’s underwater range and hence reduces the risk of detection.
TKMS indicated Singapore Technologies Electronics, a unit of defence conglomerate Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd , would co-develop the submarines' tailor-made combat system with Atlas Elektronik GmbH, a joint venture of ThyssenKrupp and European aerospace group EADS. Atlas already builds combat systems for other HDW subs including the Israeli Dolphin Class.
Singapore's projected defence budget for 2013 is Sg$12.34 billion (US$9.84 billion) up from 2012's Sg$11.83 billion in 2012. Under Singaporean law all able-bodied men must serve for two years in the military upon turning 18, providing additional manpower on top of the estimated 20,000 regulars. Singapore, surrounded by far larger neighbours has pursued a robust defence strategy since its complicated split from Malaysia in 1965. In part due to this large neighbour situation Singapore has cemented close relations with the US, Australian and Israeli military for decades.
For some Comments made in September 2009 which envisaged market distortion between HDW and Kockums see this website's earlier article on Singapore's Archer and Challenger Class submarines at http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2009/09/singapore-submarine-development.html .
For some Comments made in September 2009 which envisaged market distortion between HDW and Kockums see this website's earlier article on Singapore's Archer and Challenger Class submarines at http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2009/09/singapore-submarine-development.html .
--------------------------------
Many of the above details are from several media reports of December 2, 2013 and a TKMS Press Release of the same date:
http://www.nst.com.my/latest/singapore-to-acquire-two-submarines-from-german-firm-1.419154:
http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/12/02/thyssenkrupp-submarines-idINL5N0JH37T20131202
TKMS Press Release December 2, 2013, http://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/presse/art_detail.html&eid=TKBase_1385989544737_761385703
-Pete
3 comments:
The battle between HDW and Kockums have turned into a full submarine thriller, worthy a Tom Clancy book.
It seeems like the Swedish Submarines are winning the battle on performance and reliability, while HDW still can torpedo and sink Kockums with financial and political weapons.
Basically HDW and ThyssenKrupp has succeded to undermine and delay the construction of the A26 for about 2 years. On the other ThyssenKrupp would have been regarded as traitors by the employees i Kiel if they would have allowed Kockums to act independently and market A26 for export at the same time HDW 214-boats are suffering from problems and breakdowns.
It seems in many way´s that here is no way out for Kockums as HDW/ThyssenKrupp never will let them out of their finacial grip. If the Swedish navy don´t release the Kockums patents for use by HDW, they will most likely Close down the business as an independent Kockums would never be accpetable by HDW. BUT, if Sweden releases the patents it´s most likely they will end up in German built Sub´s to guarantee job´s in Germany.
Not sure why this earlier announcement was missed
"The sale of the Swedish shipyard ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems AB (formerly Kockums) with facilities in Malmö, Karlskrona and Muskö to Saab is complete [22/7/14]
Hi Ztev
The SAAB vs TKMS battles over Kockums was well covered by Sub Matters in many 2014 articles long before you arrived. eg. see this http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/saab-being-subsidized-to-buy-back.html
Regards
Pete
Post a Comment