Without
question or curiosity (such as "can the unproductive US and UK submarine industries deliver?") Australia's government owned ABC News reported
a multi $Billion project on February 15, 2026 at https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-15/down-payment-for-30b-adelaide-submarine-shipyard/106346484
"Prime Minister announces [US$2.76 billion] 'down payment'
towards [US$21.2b] Adelaide submarine shipyard
In
short:
The
prime minister has announced [US$2.76 billion] in funding towards [US$21.2
billion] in work for the new submarine construction yard in Adelaide.
It
will be identical to another shipyard building submarines in the UK.
What's
next?
Construction
work at the site is set to continue until 2040.
The
South Australian and federal governments have released plans
worth [US$21.2 billion] for a shipyard in Adelaide that will build at
least eight nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS pact with the US and the
UK.
[Australia's]
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that the Commonwealth would make
a [US$2.76 billion] "down payment" towards the work at
Osborne, with the rest of funding to "flow continuously" over the
rest of the shipyard's construction, due to be complete in 2040.
On
top of enabling works worth [US$1.4 billion], construction has already started
on a fabrication area worth [US$3.5 billion] and a Skills and Training Academy
worth [US$354 million].
The
The new fabrication hall for submarines will be 420 metres long — more than
twice this one at the Osborne South shipyard.
The
shipyard's developer, Australian Naval Infrastructure (ANI), a company owned by
the federal government, estimated the next stage, an outfitting area, would
cost [US$5.66 billion] to build, while an area for consolidation, testing,
launching and commission would cost more than [US$10.6 billion].
The
state government estimated at least 4,000 workers would design and build the
submarine construction yard, while 5,500 workers would support nuclear-powered
submarine production at its peak.
Long time frame for delivery
The
submarines are being built as part of the
[US$260-billion] AUKUS submarine pact announced in 2021.
It
replaced a deal to
build French-designed submarines, also in Adelaide.
The
first part of the plan is for Australia to buy between three and five
nuclear-powered submarines from the US, beginning in the early 2030s, including
at two second-hand Virginia-class submarines.
Five
of the eight SSN-AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines are due to be delivered by
the middle of the 2050s, with the final three delivered in the 2060s.
Vice Admiral Jonathan Mead of the
Australian Submarine Agency points out different parts of the new
shipyard. (ABC News)
---
Vice
Admiral Jonathan Mead, the director-general of the Australian Submarine Agency,
said experts from the US and the UK had been in Adelaide advising the build.
He
said the manufacturing process at Osborne would be "identical" to the
shipyard building submarines in the UK [except no Australian expertise in handling submarine reactors!].
"Their
facilities are 120 years old; ours will be the most modern submarine yard in
the world,"
Vice
Admiral Mead said.
Mr
Albanese said the construction work and then the work building submarines would
provide thousands of jobs into the future in Adelaide.
"If
you're a 15 or 16 year old thinking about what am I going to do with my life,
you can be assured that there will be well-paid, secure jobs here in Adelaide
and you'll get … that satisfaction of seeing what you are creating as a product
of your labour and knowing that it is very much your contribution as well to
our national interest for decades ahead," Mr Albanese said.
"We
do live in an uncertain world, but we can be certain of the economic benefit to
the tune of [US$21.2 billion] going forward here in South Australia."
Much larger than frigate work
Mr
Albanese met with South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas for a media
conference at the Osborne South shipyard five weeks ahead of the state
election.
Mr
Malinauskas said the investment at Osborne South, where
six Hunter class frigates are being built, was "extraordinary"
but it "pales into insignificance" compared with the work for the
AUKUS submarines.
"[We're]
here to announce arguably the most structurally significant contribution to our
economy that we will ever see," Mr Malinauskas said."
"What
has been announced today completely dwarfs some of the investments that we've
seen in South Australia's recent past — that boggles the mind."
While
the premier said "much" of the steel for the buildings would come
from Whyalla, Opposition Leader Ashton Hurn said she was hopeful a range of
South Australian businesses could be part of the project.
"It's
really important that we don't just become a glorified IKEA where we're
bringing in products from right across the world and just assembling them here
in South Australia," Ms Hurn said.
"We
need to be at the heart of this manufacturing opportunity, because that's what
will set us up for generations to come."
Defence Teaming Centre chief executive Libby Day says the announcement gives some certainty.
Libby
Day from the Defence Teaming Centre, which brings together different parts of
the defence industry, welcomed the announcement but said long-term contracts
were needed for local businesses.
"We need to go a step further — we need certainty around decisions involving the contracting of local companies into the supply chain of building SSN-AUKUS," Ms Day said.”
6 comments:
The focus of the political statements on job creation and demonstrating expenditure are not encouraging IMO. They suggest the focus of decision makers is on other outcomes and signaling intent, not defense capability.
Modern shipbuilding is becoming more automated, with for example use of robotics for things like hull welding. This reduces employment but improves quality and productivity. Copying UK’s Barrow yard (nowhere near best practice) is not necessarily a good thing. Could we have done better? Do we know?
THe timescale remains glacial, with most of the shipyard construction only really getting started after 2028. Who would train for a sub construction job now if they don’t start till 2035?
All those criticisms aside, any credible sub build needs a good shipyard to build in. So this is needed. I remain concerned about the time, cost and priorities.
Thanks Anonymous at 2/17/2026 11:09 PM
I share your concerns especially if the UK takes (as I think likely) until the mid 2040s to launch the first SSN-AUKUS at Barrow. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSN-AUKUS.
20+ years is a very long time to highly pay Osborne submarine yard workers until the late 2040s - before they really get into the build of the non-nuclear half of an Australian locally built SSN-AUKUS.
It may be beyond our capabilities, safety and prudence to build nuclear halves at Osborne before the 2050s.
Regards Pete
Dear Pete,
that is a lot of money for no submarine. Then it is a nuclear one and did Australia ever asked themselves if they can maintain these submarines without foreign aid? Maybe Nigel Farage is not so well known down under but what does this Kremlin asset thinks about selling submarines? Diesel could be produced even with organic waste but how will Australia get highly enriched uranium?
Regards,
MHalblaub
Hi MHalblaub at 2/19/2026 4:55 AM
Simple :(
The AUKUS con game requires Australia to invest ten times the cost of 3 new Virginias for 3 old Virginias. Decades of total reliance on US control and goodwill. 1,000s of years of toxic nuclear waste - storing that will be equal in cost to a whole new AUKUS.
Even when we pay too much for UK SSNs (with UK's tradition of project mismanagement) this will be subject to US control and veto, because much intellectual property in UK SSNs are US inventions.
Pete
Australia has less than half of the UK population and yet it has a need to maintain a yard and fleet of 6 nuclear submarines at chop carrot head prices. I do wonder how sustainable this will be financially.
Hi Abao at 2/26/2026 1:01 AM
It gets even worse. Australia wants 8 SSNs all up and of TWO distinct classes (with all the spares and maintenance inefficiencies 2 classes involves).
Also Australia might receive 5 Virginias from the US and build a handful (only THREE) SSN AUKUSes in Adelaide South Australia - an efficient build number?
Post a Comment