---
The issues of the Dutch Walrus class submarine replacement and the future Swedish Saab-Kockums A26 development-construction are relevant to Australia's future submarine selection. This would become more important if the Soryu is not selected for whatever reason, forcing Australia to seriously consider European submarine designs.
Saab-Damen Agreement
Since mid-late January 2015 there have been several reports that Saab and Dutch
shipbuilder Damen Shipyards Group have signed an exclusive teaming agreement. This is to:
- explore future opportunities in the international submarine
market including bidding jointly on submarine procurement programmes, and
- explore development of a potential Walrus-class submarine
replacement for the Netherlands.
Netherlands' Situation
The Netherlands operates 4 teardrop hulled Walrus class submarines which are a development
of the Dutch Zwaardvis class (2 Zwaardvis were sold to Taiwan). The Zwaadvis was based on the US teardrop hulled Barbel class (the
US's last conventional subs).
Walrus specifications:
- 4 launched 1989-1992
- displacement 2,350 tons (surfaced)
- range 18,500 km at 9
knots (snorting) vs Collins 17,000 km
at 10 knots (snorting)
- 20 US weapons Mark 48 torpedos and
Harpoon missiles (weapons the same as the Collins. Collins has 22 torpedos)
which suggest part use of a US combat system already.
- US heritage
- no reliance (like the Collins) on
AIP
- like the
Collins it has four combined rudders and diving planes in an "X"
configuration
- with most NATO
submarine being either nuclear or brown water Baltic the Walrus are considered
blue water submarines.
The Netherlands
envisages acquiring just 2 submarines to replace the 4 Walruses. Just 2 may mean the Netherlands might want to use/select a common-overlapping design with Sweden. Maybe the Netherlands may settle for modified A26s.
[As at mid March 2015 the Netherlands' requirements remain unknown.]
Possible Swedish Role
While Sweden is building its own two A26s Sweden might build the two to four Walrus replacements or at least supply the components for assembly in the Netherlands.
[As at mid March 2015 the Netherlands' requirements remain unknown.]
Possible Swedish Role
While Sweden is building its own two A26s Sweden might build the two to four Walrus replacements or at least supply the components for assembly in the Netherlands.
Sweden's 3 Gotland Class submarines (launched 1995-96) need replacing by 2025 and 2 Sodermanland class (relaunched 2003) for replacement by 2035(?).
Some extra issues/questions are:
1. How many A26s does Sweden intend to build? Two or five (?) - given the rising Russian threat and the Gotland-Sodermanland two tiered "gap".
2. Will the A26 have the same specifications as
provided on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A26_submarine (1900
tons surfaced? A mixture of regular 533mm torpedo tubes and unique 400mm tubes?). Saab-Kockums' own website does not give specifications of
diplacement or range.
3. Will the A26 be built with Lithium-ion batteries?
4. Would there be some technical, industrial and political overlap in the Walrus-class submarine replacement and development and construction of Sweden's future submarine A26?
5. Would the Netherlands find only 2 Walrus replacement submarines an effective number, given the "rule" of three and usefulness to the US alliance experience with the 4 Walruses.
6. Could the Netherlands continue to justify unusually large SSKs or scale down to the usual European country own use maximum of around 1,900 tons surfaced?
Pete
5. Would the Netherlands find only 2 Walrus replacement submarines an effective number, given the "rule" of three and usefulness to the US alliance experience with the 4 Walruses.
6. Could the Netherlands continue to justify unusually large SSKs or scale down to the usual European country own use maximum of around 1,900 tons surfaced?
Pete