In May 2017 Japan will despatch the carrier JS Izumo to run a type of Freedom of Navigation Operation (FONOPs) against China's new empire on sea. Japan continues to develop and increase the size of its
(defensive under the Constitution) “helicopter destroyers”. As viewers would notice these are really
small-medium aircraft-helicopter carriers. They are of similar size to Japan’s former WWII carriers. While the current four carriers (see below) are mainly for
helicopters they are capable of carrying F-35Bs fast strike fighters - a reality
not lost on China.
The carriers JS Izumo (83) and newly commissioned JS Kaga (84) certainly don't look like "destroyers". (Photo courtesy Reuters and South China Morning Post)
---
1. CARRIER
CAPABILITIES
1. In comments
of 20 and 22 March 2017 Anonymous discussed activities of Japan’s four
carriers:
They can each carry:
functions are mainly ASW
but they are also capable of anti-shipping, mine counter measures,
ground attack and troop carrying, or
= be modified to carry larger aircraft, eg. F-35B
VTOL strike aircraft and V-22
Osprey fast troop carrying tiltrotor craft.
= medium sized helicopters. and
= for Western aircraft carriers Hyuga and Ise are
unusual in actually carrying some destroyer
armaments, ie. 16 x Mk 41 VLS and 6 x LWT tubes.
armaments, ie. 16 x Mk 41 VLS and 6 x LWT tubes.
Carrier comparison. From top ROK's Dokdo class Landing Platform Helicopter, UK Invincible class, Charles de Gaulle (France of course), Izumo, USS Nimitz (Diagram courtesy kmozzart).
---
2. JS IZUMO IN
SOUTH CHINA SEA (May 2017)
According to REUTERS
JPN Japan is sending Izumo
to the South China Sea in May 2017 to visit Singapore, Indonesia and the
Philippines (President Duterte may be invited aboard ("If
[he has] time."). On this voyage see first part of this Youtube.
Might Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia also be
added to the list?
The South China Sea activity will be Japan’s biggest show of naval force in the region since WWII. Japan will likely send other ships (identities
not yet known, but typically they would include a destroyer, replenishment ship and maybe a
submarine (for ASW practice)).
3. JS IZUMO at MALABAR 2017 in July 2017
Izumo will participate in the ASW
themed Exercise MALABAR 2017, to
be held off India between the USN, Indian and Japanese navies, in July 2017.
Izumo will return to Fleet Base Yokosuka, Japan
in August 2017.
4. CHINA OPPOSES IZUMO’S SOUTH CHINA SEA VOYAGE
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying was reallly, really angry about Izumo's South China Sea voyage. On March 16, 2017 she said:
“Out of its selfish interests, Japan has been stirring up troubles and creating
splits in the South China Sea. Their behaviour has prompted dissatisfaction and
opposition of the Chinese people. If the
Japanese side insists on doing so, or even attempts to get militarily involved
in the South China Sea, harm China's sovereignty and security, and heighten
regional tensions, the Chinese side will definitely take firm actions in
response.”
[Hua continued] “I want to remind the Japanese
side that they are not a party concerned in the South China Sea issue, and that
they have a disgraceful history of occupying China's Xisha [Paracel] and Nansha [Spratly] Islands
during its war of aggression against China. The Japanese side should reflect
upon the history, and be discreet with its words and deeds, instead of making
waves in the South China Sea and impairing regional peace and stability.”
Pete Comment – Clearly China approves of its own
increases in power projection into the South China Sea but cannot imagine other
countries have rights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A postscript:
IJN Sōryū. At 19,000 tons the same size as JS Hyuga and Ise. A good name for a submarine class :) The Sōryū carrier was part of the Pearl Harbour strike, bombed Darwin, then was sunk at Midway.
10 comments:
Dear Pete,
the picture of Izumo and Hayuga is a fake. Someone did edited the figures on the carriers but not the waves beside of the two ships. Like a finger print. That could never happen.
I first stumbled about the dinghy. Also just up-sized?
The bow of the fake Izumo looks edited and is in reality not straight to the end. The lift section looks also unreal. The RAM-Starter in front of Izumo's bridge is missing. The helicopters on the center deck line are all the same. No change in perspective.
Here a real picture of the Izumo-class:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jweQIMfKmMg/maxresdefault.jpg
Regards,
MHalblaub
Hi MHalblaub
Thanks for noticing the photo is fake. I'll put in something better to contrast their size.
Regards
Pete
Hi Pete
Data of English Wiki is wrong. According JPN Wiki and other source, Izumo-Class carries 14 aircraft maximum not 28.
7 ASW helicopters and 2 SAR helicopters are correct figures.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JS_Izumo
(General characteristics, Aircraft carried: Aircraft carried: 7 ASW helicopters and 2 SAR helicopters, 28 aircraft maximum)
Regards
It is not clear if Izumo's deck can handle the very hot jet blast from F35B. The deck may need an upgrade.
KQN
Anonymous and KQN
Thanks for your correctionisms.
Changed
Pete
The number of aircraft is a somewhat arbitrary number; you can park more a/c if you're willing to sacrifice deck space. The 7/2 number is what they currently ship out with, though that's pretty obviously a very light load for a ship of its size.
As far as I know the Japanese ships are not equipped to handle F-35 operations in terms of jet blast or ammunition. They would almost certainly need a modification program to operate as such, though I assume they were built with that possibility in mind.
Cheers,
Josh
Hi Josh
Yes I said "modified" several hours ago. The Ospreys also have notoriously hot blast/exhaust liable to singe/set alight any unmodified deck.
Cheers
Pete
@Pete:
Actually now that you mention it the DDHs are much better suited to operate as de facto LHAs with MV-22 then CVLs with F-35.
Cheers,
Josh
Hi Pete
In Japan, there is an opinion that counter measures against heat from F-35B are conducted without data or discussion.
But, I point out the heat management system based on data and discussion. JS Kaga was ordey red in 2010. Needs of heat management system in flight deck for V-22 Osprey were discussed in 2009 USA. Certain heat management system or resemble system for V-22 may be introduced into Kaga, because post-building modification of flight is more difficult and expensive than its ntroduction at design stage. But, as exhaust heat of F-35 seems to higher than that from V-22, use of F-35 is not clear.
Regards
Hi Pete
Legally, any surface combatant ship belongs to destroyer.
According to JMSDF directive on naming of its shpis, its ships are classified into two groups (guard ships, support ships), and guard ships are classified into four sub-groups (combatant ships, mine ships, patrol ships, transport ships). Combatant ships consist of destroyer and submarine. Category of carrier does not exist in JMSDF.
Regards
Post a Comment