Canadian Defence Strategy vs US Aggression - Greenland?

This is a national defense plan for Canada in the increasingly credible likelihood of conflict with the United States. Greenland-Denmark (the subject of a future article) is even in more need of a strategy against Russian inspired American aggression.

Ukraine would be the most recent example of a successful defence (perhaps temporary) against a superpower aggressor. 

For Canada that might entail:

Stockpiling of food, spare parts, gas/oil/coal and other essentials from now.

Intelligence gathering (by Canadian Military Intelligence, CSIS Humint, CSE Sigint and Imagery including Canada's Sapphire and Gray Jay satellites) by Canada and Canada's non-US allies concerning:

- US intentions
- changes in US military dispositions and preparations
- ratcheting up of US economic measures (including blockades) against Canada
- Trump's daily communications with, and instructions from Russia

Ongoing analyses of the above collected intelligence. Also an analysis of Trump's many statements which may signal US intentions.

Because of much larger US numbers Canada would be better served by a highly dispersed insurgent strategy than contemplating open battle. This would include:

-  Canadian military and militia use of man portable anti-tank and anti-aircraft/helicopter/drone weapons. 

-  Canadian use of defensive aerial drones, landmines, sea mines and sea drones (UUVs and USVs). 

Canada must reinforce the reality that it is a victim fighting a defensive war.  against Trump's Fascism This could be communicated by a soft-power campaign communicating that message to the international democratic community. That community would include remaining American progressives who must be persuaded that conflict is not in the interests of ordinary Americans.

Justin Trudeau should continue to be seen as the leader of the Canadian freedom. Trudeau should be protected from US or domestic assassination attempts.