December 16, 2021

S Korean nuke sub Reactor likely to be French K15 Variant

India's Bharat Express News December 14, 2021 carries the New York Times (NYT) December 13, 2021 article "South Korea has long wanted nuclear submarines. A new reactor could open a door." without readers having to subscribe to NYT. NYT's article is reproduced by Bharat Express here https://www.thebharatexpressnews.com/south-korea-has-long-wanted-nuclear-submarines-a-new-reactor-could-open-a-door/

SUBMARINE MATTERS BACKGROUND AND COMMENT

South Korea is leaning toward a LEU reactor solution perhaps initially on a South Korea SSBN - which will be based around the ballistic missile submarine KSS-III SSB. It is not surprising South Korea has long been in talks with France (since 2017 if not earlier) about South Korea building a variant of France's K15 LEU reactor. The K15 is on France's Triomphant class SSBNs and, in slightly smaller form, on the France's Barracuda-Suffren class SSNs. 

In Submarine Matters’ “South Korea seeks Submarine Reactors from US and RUSSIA” of October 22, 2019 South Korea may have concluded it is better to buy an existing submarine reactor or at least a ship reactor than totally reinvent a submarine reactor. 

Since 2017 (if not earlier) South Korea has been considering France’s new Barracuda SSN with its K15 (aka K 15 aka K-15) reactor. With North Korea's buildup of nuclear weapon and missile capabilities South Korea, in October 2019, has been testing any increased US willingness for South Korea to explore nuclear propulsion options. 

The Triomphant-class's 2(?) x K15s and Barracuda's single K15 reactor stands for 150 MWt  power which translates to a total of 30 MWe electrical power (for the French Barracuda’s non-propulsive electrical services hotel load + propulsion).

"In October 2017, the [South Korean] Navy commissioned the Seoul-based Korea Defense Network to conduct a five month study on the feasibility of developing an indigenous nuclear-powered attack submarine. The think tank reported in March 2018 the results to the Navy, suggesting the service build a nuclear attack submarine along the lines of the French 5,300-ton Barracuda-class sub. The French sub is fueled by low-enriched uranium."

Now that the US and UK have given the green light to supplying Australia with a reactor under the AUKUS deal it is conceivable that France may want supply just the Barracuda’s K15 reactor or transfer technology (including a reactor design) for South Korea to incorporate in its 4,000+ tonne KSS III Batch III building program. 

The Barracuda’s K15 reactor has the:

-  political/regulatory advantage of using LEU ie. less than 20% U-235 which South Korea sees as not being restricted by the NPT or nuclear Safeguards Agreements. This is compared to the political sensitivities and anti-proliferation regulatory restrictions (up until September 2021's AUKUS deal) placed on exporting/importing US and UK HEU submarine reactors. The UK/US reactors use weapons’ grade HEU of 93-97 percent (see p. 20)

-  technical advantage of being built for a submarine of just over 5,000 tons, ie. in South Korea's KSS III Bach III weight bracket. While the 
KSS III Batch II with 10 x VLS silos  has diesel-electric (also AIP) propulsion the proposed KSS III Batch III may eventuall have 12 to 16 VLS silos requiring an unusually large propulsion solution. Nuclear has been the solution for SSBNs built by the US, Russia, UK, France, China and India. 

-  Also Naval Group's assistance to Brazil to create a SSN, known as Alvaro Alberto, is highly relevant to the South Korean SSN (aka KSS-N) project, Alvaro Alberto's projected launch year (2029) and commissioning (2032-2034) may occur in the same timeframe as the South Korean SSN project.  At Submarine Matter’s 2015 article see the subheading "Brazilian Nuclear Submarine (SN-BR)” There currently appears to be expectations that SN-BR will be around 100m long and 9m wide. This coincides with France's Barracuda SSN dimensions of: 99.5m long and beam: 8.8m.” 

-  So a A K15 variant first mounted on a South Korean SSBN by the early 2030s may be followed by mounting a K15 reactor variant on a South Korean SSN by the mid 2030s. In terms of vertically launched cruise or ballistic missiles the KSS Batch I features 6 VLS tubes, each with one missile. The KSS III Batch II may feature 10 and the KSS III Batch III perhaps 12 to 16. 

South Korea's neighbour Japan (a part strategic competitor of South Korea) is observing South Korea's interest in nuclear propulsion and ever larger submarines.

India, already having SSBNs, is interested in building 6 x Project 75 Alpha class SSNs with specialised SSN reactors. India is naturally talking to France's Naval Group. Naval Group is already  helping India build the 6 Kalvari-class Scorpenes, and bidding for India's 6 x AIP diesel-electric Project-75I SSK competition. Naval Group produces all of France's SSNs and SSBNs. So India can have far ranging discussions, on many topics, with Naval Group.

4 comments:

Clive Dorer said...

You're probably already aware of this, but just in case not, there is a comprehensive new (14 Dec) report from the ASPI re AUKUS Sub program:

https://www.aspi.org.au/report/implementing-australias-nuclear-submarine-program


I'm still digesting it all...

Clive Dorer said...

Also, everyones favorite submarine artist, Messr Sutton, has produced this speculative gem of a SK KSS-3(N).

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/12/south-koreas-first-nuclear-submarine-looks-closer/

I'm baffled why VLS would be between reactor and drive machinery.

Pete said...

Hi Clive

Yes. Splitting the reator/propulsion machinery into 2 compartments would also force the propulsion engineering crew to decide which of the 2 compartments they are effectively restricted to.

The VLS compartment (especially if it mounts nuclear tipped ballistic missiles + ever present explosive rocket fuel) is a restricted area that should not get caught up in reactor radiation complications, high pressure steam hazards and high temperature diesel electric backup sparks or fires.

Also the propulsion crew are ordinarally only permitted to cross a ballistic missile compartment 2 to 4 times a day from the main forward sleeping/eating compartment of the sub. A propulsion compartment on each side of the missile compartment would be bad for security.

Anonymous said...

It is quite obvious that LEU "à la K15" is the natural solution and is probably in the works

-SK has not weapon grade HEU capabilities
-The SK nuclear industry is very robust, very similar, if not identical in the fuel cycle, to the French one ,with 30 years+ of collaboration and initial 2 French plants built.It has N fuel production and a disposal programm
The last ,2020,technical agreementn centered around the safe automated dismantling..
A similar situation exist in Japan where the spent fuel is reprocessed in France and the mixed oxydes fuel shipped back for further production at KEPCO


KHNP is the chief competitor of ORANO /EDF
The real issue is whether SK will do it alone or with a French supply/licence..

TKMS gave a licence to SK for the 209...not for export..apparently