February 21, 2024

No early SSN (even in 2032?) for the RAN

As Virginias for the RAN might only arrive in the late 2030s, it is fortunate the first Collins LOTE is scheduled from "mid-2026". See the Australian Submarine Agency (ASA) reference https://www.asa.gov.au/aukus/collins-class-submarines

US Virginias

The most authoritative source, the ASA, is no longer talking first Virginia for Australia in 2032. Rather ASA is on record as writing https://www.asa.gov.au/aukus/australias-nuclear-powered-submarines :

"The United States intends to sell Australia 3 Virginia Class SSNs (nuclear-powered submarines) from as soon as the early 2030s, which was authorised by the US Congress in December 2023. Australia retains the option to seek approval for up to 2 more if needed....". 

The US offer very much relies on much higher yearly Virginia production, through to commissioning, rates of Virginias than the US (now also entering full Columbia SSBN production) has been able to achieve since the 1990s. 

Also a US President in the 2030s must be satisfied that the USN is receiving all the Virginias it needs before he/she can approve any spare Virginias for Australia.  

UK SSN-AUKUS

The UK's final Astute (Agincourt) might be commissioned in 2026 or later. Simultaneously many of the UKs limited nuclear sub building force will be committed to the 4 new generation SSBN (Dreadnought) program until about 2045. This is if Dreadnoughts are  commissioned every 4 years from 2033  see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadnought-class_submarine#Boats_of_the_class

About the SSN-AUKUS for Australia the Australian Submarine Agency writes - see https://www.asa.gov.au/aukus/australias-nuclear-powered-submarines :

"The UK will commence construction of its first SSN-AUKUS in Barrow-in-Furness UK, as early as the late 2020s. The UK intends to deliver its first SSN-AUKUS to the UK Royal Navy in the late 2030s

[It is only after SSN-AUKUS are delivered to the UK RN that they can be completed at Osborne, Adelaide, for the RAN.]

Hence the Australian Submarine Agency, very ambiguously on timings, writes - https://www.asa.gov.au/aukus/australias-nuclear-powered-submarines :

"Australia's nuclear-powered submarines - SSN-AUKUS - will be based on the UK's next generation design that incorporates technology from all 3 nations, including cutting edge US submarine technologies."

In plain English the UK RN will need to commission its first SSN-AUKUS from "late 2030s" then one should expect several years of trials before commissioning this first-of-class (say 2042) then years to tool up Osborne, Adelaide for production - (say from 2045).

For subsequent confirmation of the difficulties and delays leading to lateness of the UK's SSN-AUKUS, flowing on to late Australian SSN-AUKUS timings, see Peter Briggs' excellent essay at ASPI’s The Strategist titled “SSN AUKUS is at the back of the queue” of 27 Feb 2024, at https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/ssn-aukus-is-at-the-back-of-the-queue/ .

French Barracuda SSNs

There is a myth that France could deliver SSNs to the RAN simply and more quickly if President Macron or Naval Group so will it. But France's very limited NUCLEAR (as distinct from CONVENTIONAL) submarine designing-building workforce are mainly committed to finishing their own Navy's last Barracudas - until 2031 see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barracuda-class_submarine_%28France%29#Boats

In parallel the balance of France's NUCLEAR submarine workforce are working on France's 3rd Generation SSBN (French acronym "SNLE 3G") see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNLE_3G#Design_and_operation  :

"first steel [was] cut for the vessels in 2023 and completed submarines delivered at a rate of one every five years from 2035, with the programme completing in 2050." 

All this means is France will not have some nuclear manpower resources for any Australian  Barracuda SSN Project until the late 2040s, if not after 2050. That includes too few Frenchmen even to train up an Australian workforce - with our workforce totally inexperienced in building SSNs.

Hedging Plan

As SSNs from the US are politically unprovable until the 2030s and unlikely to be in the form of SSN-AUKUS for the RAN before 2045, and even less likely and later from France, a hedging plan is appropriate. That is:

 -  as ASA has written, Australia doing its Collins LOTE. I suggest Saab with its experience, effectively LOTEing the Gotland-class, can assist see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotland-class_submarine#Mid-life_upgrade_contract . 

-  Australia is also developing XLUUVs (partly under AUKUS Pillar 2). XLUUVs can lay smartmines, do electronic intercepts and other reconnaissance and even tow sonars. 

-  Australia alongside the US and UK, partly under AUKUS, could develop ever longer range missiles for long range strike, including anti-shipping. Such missiles already include Tomahawks. New types of longer range hypersonic (steerable) missiles are where the West's peer competitors (China and Russia) are venturing. For example something like a Western equivalent of China's DF-26 (anti-ship capable) missile may be of medium-long term value for Australia.  

It is no coincidence that Australia is developing dual-use long range missile capabilities under cover of NASA assistance (see the "Mar 2018" and "Jul 2018" items here) in Australia's Gilmour Space Technologies "Block 1" "rocket" or missile

Please don't get me started on the possibilities of the Australian developed third generation "SILEX" laser enrichment of Uranium technology or where I'm going might be too obvious...

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The *other* submarine threat to Australia:

"A low-profile vessel (LPV), popularly termed a "narco-submarine", was
interdicted on February 14 2024. Subsequent reports from the court
proceedings suggest that it was destined for Australia.

The prospect of narco-submarines being used in the trans-Pacific drug
trade have been researched previously. But this is the first time an
interdicted narco-sub has been directly associated with the route."

See:

http://www.hisutton.com/Narco-Submarine-To-Australia.html

Pete2 said...

NORCO-SUB

Thanks Anonymous at 2/23/2024 4:25 AM

As it is around 15,000km from Columbia to Australia I think the narco-sub simply couldn't make it. The Pacific it a wide rough ocean. A severe storm could easily destroy a narco-sub by capsizing it. ie. turning it over with the drug load crushing the crew.

More likely it would need to offload its drug cargo to a ship (say 1,500km off Columbia's coast) with the ship transporting the drugs the rest of the journey of around 13,500km.

Australia's Federal Police and Border Force are most interested.

Cheers Pete