Nicky commented
on November 5, 2019 in response to my South Korean DSME 2000 Concept Submarine, Specifications,
Potential Customers article of November 4, 2019. My reply to Nicky just grew and grew. So I am making it into
the following comment with links.
I think an assumption that the "Philippines can[not]
afford submarines coming from South Korea or Europe" is dated. The
Philippines is no longer a poor country reliant on very old second-hand vessels. For example, the Philippines has bought 2 NEW frigates
from South Korea.
This is also noting South Korea's DSME Chang Bogos (Type 209 variants) would be far cheaper than future, larger and new battery technology, DSME 2000s.
This is also noting South Korea's DSME Chang Bogos (Type 209 variants) would be far cheaper than future, larger and new battery technology, DSME 2000s.
If you look at this IMF Countries
by Nominal GDP in 2019 List you'll see the Philippines (at US$347 Billion)
is richer than:
- Egypt (at US$302 Billion) - that has just bought new
German Type 209 submarines
- Chile (at US$294 Billion) that has 2 old German subs but 2 recent French
Scorpene subs
- Pakistan (at US$284 Billion) that has 5 French subs and
buying 8 subs from China, and
- much richer than Portugal (at US$236 Billion) and Greece (at
US$214 Billion) that both have
European subs.
European subs.
I'd add that South Korea is a more efficient, lower cost
submarine builder than Russia. “In 2011, South
Korea beat Russia, France, and Germany in competition for a $1.1 billion
tender to supply Indonesia with three [Chang Bogo] Type 209-class submarines.”
Russia's Kilo submarine, approaching 4,000 tons full load, is large for a conventional sub, making it ill suited to the shallows and narrows of the Philippine archipelago. A Kilo is almost 3 times the size of a South Korean DSME Chang Bogo (1,400 tons) and about twice the size of a future DSME 2000 (2,180 tonnes).
Russia's Kilo submarine, approaching 4,000 tons full load, is large for a conventional sub, making it ill suited to the shallows and narrows of the Philippine archipelago. A Kilo is almost 3 times the size of a South Korean DSME Chang Bogo (1,400 tons) and about twice the size of a future DSME 2000 (2,180 tonnes).
Russia
generally lacks the money to equal South Korea's soft loan enticements. Also Russia has a
notoriously high cost, shoddy work submarine overhaul and weapons upgrade
reputation. Just ask
the Indians about how unreliable the Russian upgrade for India's Kilos subs
was. This upgrade was to fit Klub anti-ship missiles to India's Kilos - with the missiles proving
particularly unreliable.
Yes, as I indicated in the November 4, 2019 article, Chile and Argentina are
possible buyers for DSME 2000s. Argentina has such old subs that they are unsafe,
like the ARA San Juan, that sadly sank.
I don't know whether Columbia needs medium-large subs for their
main role - which is anti-drug smuggler surveillance. See my
2015 article where Columbia, in 2015, acquired 2 small 500 ton Type 206s from
Germany.
For more on the Philippines see my articles:
- “Any US Block on Philippines BuyingSubmarines a Big Mistake” of 12 November 2019, and
- "Submarine Choices for the Philippines" of November 14, 2019.
For more on the Philippines see my articles:
- “Any US Block on Philippines BuyingSubmarines a Big Mistake” of 12 November 2019, and
- "Submarine Choices for the Philippines" of November 14, 2019.
Pete





