December 13, 2015

Tomahawk Cruise Missiles and Friends Hitting ISIS

All the recent interest in the Russian Kalibr forgets the West's much longer history of hitting insurgents and conventional armies with Tomahawk cruise missiles. Not only missiles but ground attack aircraft like the A-10 Warthog (below).


US Navy warships USS Philippine Sea and USS Arleigh Burke launch Tomahawk missiles on ISIS targets in Syria in 2014. USS Philippine Sea is a Flight II Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser and USS Arleigh Burke is the lead ship of the Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers.
---

The Tomahawk is not alone. There is also the UK-European Storm Shadow, US AGM-86 and more advanced hypersonic missiles in the works.
---


Interesting background on the Tomahawk cruise missile. It has been in service since 1983 and in wars since 1991 - decades before the Russian Kalibr. A cruise missile is guided using several systems, the major portion of whose flight path to its target (a land-based or sea-based target) is conducted at approximately constant velocity; that relies on the dynamic reaction of air for lift, and upon propulsion forces to balance drag. 

Cruise missiles are designed to deliver a large warhead over long distances with high accuracy. Modern cruise missiles can travel at supersonic or high subsonic speeds, are self-navigating, and can fly on a non-ballistic, extremely low altitude trajectory. 
---



The A-10 "Warthog" is ugly but effective. In September 2014, the USAF A-10 strike wing revealed it would be deploying to the Middle East in the next month, which includes 12 of the unit's 21 A-10 aircraft. The timing coincided with the ongoing US airstrike campaign against ISIS. Since mid-November 2014, US commanders began sending A-10s to hit IS targets in central and northwestern Iraq on an almost daily basis.


The A-10 Warthog, 30 mm rotary cannon, over Iraq and Syria against ISIS.
---

Pete


December 12, 2015

China - Australia Defence Relations Closer - Meetings

Chief of the General Staff, PLA, General Fang Fenghui and Australian Defence Minister Marise Payne at meeting.

Visit to Australia by China’s General Fang Fenghui

2 December 2015 | AUSTRALIAN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE Media Release http://news.defence.gov.au/2015/12/02/visit-to-australia-by-chinas-general-fang-fenghui/

Chief of the General Staff Department ofChina’s People’s Liberation Army General Fang Fenghui , visited Australia this week to conduct the Defence Strategic Dialogue, co-hosted for Australia by the Chief of the Defence Force, Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin AC, and the Secretary of the Department of Defence, Mr Dennis Richardson AO.
This year marks the 18th year of the annual Dialogue, demonstrating that the bilateral defence relationship is robust, and an important aspect of the broader relationship.
The annual dialogue offers the leadership of the Australian Defence Organisation and China’s Peoples’ Liberation Army the opportunity to engage in open and frank discussion on issues of common concern and to discuss a forward program of bilateral defence engagement activities.
While visiting Canberra, General Fang also met with the Minister for Defence, Senator the Hon Marise Payne, to discuss the bilateral defence relationship.
General Fang also visited Headquarters Joint Operations Command where he met with Commander Joint Operations, Vice Admiral David Johnston AM, RAN, and toured the facility. General Fang visited Australia from 30 November to 1 December.

Stephen McDonell and staff for Australian government owned ABC Online report, December 4, 2014, http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-03/china-australia-bolster-military-links-after-talks/5939252
 China and Australia set to bolster military links following high-level talks in Beijing

Canberra and Beijing have agreed on an unspecified program of enhanced military cooperation for next year, including exchanges, training and service-to-service engagement.

Australian officials confirmed new avenues to foster defence links would go ahead but did not provide further details.

Chief of Defence Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin was at the annual country-to-country military talks in the Chinese capital when the announcement was made.

In a written statement he said Australia was "committed to working with China" and that there was "a growing maturity" in the defence engagement between Australia and its largest trading partner.

"We discussed the forward program of engagement between the Department of Defence and the People's Liberation Army in 2015, including strategic dialogue, service engagement, practical cooperation activities, personnel exchanges and training and education opportunities," he said.

"Our ability to discuss issues in an open and transparent way is a sign of the growing maturity in our defence engagement. We are committed to working with China to ensure a strong, stable and prosperous region."

China's state-run wire service Xinhua said the pledge was the result of a meeting between vice chairman of China's Central Military Commission, Fan Changlong, Air Chief Marshal Binskin and Australian secretary of defence Dennis Richardson, who were visiting China for the annual defence strategic dialogue.

Mr Fan reportedly said the agreement marked "a new high of mutual political trust between our countries".

"Military ties forge an important part of bilateral ties," he said. 

The two countries have worked closely in the search for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 as well as in peacekeeping, anti-terrorism, joint exercises and education exchanges, Xinhau reported Mr Fan as saying, adding he vowed to further promote military cooperation.” 

Pete

Rocket Planes Part Two - Neil Armstrong & Chuck Yeager



Neil Armstrong, then a Test Pilot, next to his X-15 edge of space rocket plane around 1962. That was  7 years before his captaining the July 1969 Apollo 11 mission to the Moon. (Photo courtesy Uncover California).
--- 

Prior to Apollo 11 Armstrong had a dangerous career:  

-  He cheated death as a fighter pilot in Korea (flew back having lost much of a wing).  

-  As a test pilot he intentionally pushed his X-15 beyond the limits of controllable flight (see below).  

-  As an astronaut in Gemini 8 as his spacecraft was in a freak spin at a revolution per second - near unconscious he analysed the problem and gained control of his craft.  

-  In May 1968 he was within 0.2 seconds of being killed in an uncontrollable Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV) crash.  

All these events contributed to Armstrong being chosen to be first on the Moon. He had proven he was cool under pressure - and lucky. 


ARMSTRONG'S "CROSS COUNTRY" FLIGHT

The X-15 rocket plane was also almost all fuel tank. Its loaded weight was twice its empty weight and as is carried no weapons all the extra weight was fuel (with the small addition of the pilot). It began it’s flight at about 30,000 feet when dropped from a converted B-52. An X-15 pilot would fire the rocket engine and shoot upwards faster than the speed of sound until he ran out of fuel after maybe 2 minutes. Momentum carried the X-15  over the top of an arcing flight path where, in the thin upper atmosphere, rockets in the aircraft’s nose gave some directional control. 

The X-15 would then glide-plummet with no engine. The X-15 became a "glider" but as its wingspan was shorter than its body it was like a stone with stubby wings. Falling to Earth, the pilot traced out large circles above the runway to slow his speed to a manageable 370 km per hour at landing. He had only one shot to land - no go-arounds 

April 20, 1962 Neil Armstrong's X-15 separated from the B-52 and accelerated past Mach 5 with ease and in control of the aircraft. An unexpected problem developed when he tried to aim the aircraft back towards the runway at Edwards Air Force Base 

He was in the thin upper atmosphere, and with the X-15 nose angled upwards, he bounced off the atmosphere instead of being able to aim the nose down to control his flight. The tail of the X-15 skipped off the atmosphere like a stone on water, carrying him further from Edwards. Gravity eventually took over and he was able to set himself back on track for landing. The only problem was that he was 50 miles south of where he wanted to be, and he didn’t have an engine to light to get him any closer.  

Making his situation worse, there weren’t any safe lakebeds for an emergency landing between him and Edwards. The X-15 had metal skids instead of wheels for landing gear as skids when landing on dry mud acted as brakes. So Armstrong needed to land on the dry lakebed surrounding Edwards or crash. One of the pilots following him in an F-104 chase plane saw Armstrong in the X-15 flying level with the treetops he was so low coming in to land. But he managed a safe landing. 

The near tragic flight, which lasted 12 and a half minutes, was jokingly referred to as Armstrong’s cross country flight.



 

Short bio details on the late Neil Armstrong who passed away August 25, 2012..

----------------------------------------------------------------------


 

One more Right Stuff scene. In December 1963 test pilot Chuck Yeager [who died December 7, 2020] attempted a height record in a F-104 Starfighter (promoted as the "missile with a man in it" instead of the less upbeat "Widow Maker"). The standard F-104 is only jet powered, but Yeager was using a NF-104A

The NF-104A was a hybrid rocket (fired 3:15 in above youtube) and jet powered craft. Note (1:40 into the youtube) the Roar of Acceleration as the rocket-jet plane shifts to Afterburner. Turn up loud!

The firing of the ejector seat ignited the pure oxygen in Yeager's face mask. Being a a test pilot in a rocket plane is a risky business.

Please connect with Submarine Matters Mother Ships and Rocket Planes - Part One, December 8, 2015. 

Pete

December 11, 2015

China's bases in the Indian Ocean - New Djibouti Base

The European Union (EU) welcomed China's support against the Somalian pirate scourge.
---

In 2010 the Chief of Staff of European Union Naval Forces for Somalia (EUNAVFOR Somalia), …told reporters that China's decision to send PLA-N forces across the Indian Ocean to handle Somalian pirates was "extremely good news and will allow us to surge other assets into the Somali basin, where pirate activity remains at an all-time high."

Large Replenishment Ships, like the PLA-N’s Type 093A are an essential accompaniment to Chinese frigates, destroyers and (maybe) submarine anti-piracy activities in the Horn of Africa region (Photo courtesy CIMSEC).

Over recent years China has put varying arrangements in place to have some naval and/or air access to:

-  Hong Kong protected by PLA-N
-  Sanya Base, Hainan Island, China
-  Woody Island and Spratley Islands (in South China Sea)
-  Sihanoukville Autonomous Port, Cambodia (dual civilian - naval use)
-  plans for Kra Isthmus Canal in Thailand
-  Chittagong, Bangladesh
-  Hambantota, Sri Lanka
-  Marao, Maldives
-  Gwadar, Pakistan
-  NATO Libya intervention temporarily ejected China
-  Dili Harbour, Baucau airfield (both vulnerable to Chinese "investment"), East Timor
-  Lamu, Kenya
-  Port Sudan, Sudan
-  Port of Darwin, Australia (99 year lease) near rim of Indian Ocean
-  Djibouti (see below) 


China has various dual-use port arrangements with countries in the Indian Ocean that give Chinese civilian vessels and naval vessels some security. (Map courtesy CIMSEC)
---

As an example of China's consolidation in the Indian Ocean there is the base in Djibouti.

In 2015 China has been cementing its position in the tiny country of Djibouti (see left-center red dot on above map). France has long has bases in Djibouti and more recently the US opened a large (Camp Lemonnier) Base in strategic Djibouti. Djibouti provides China easy access to African - Middle East flashpoints.

His Excellency Mahamoud Ali Youssouf, Minister of Foreign Affairs for the Republic of Djibouti in Washington DC's, The HillDecember 10, 2015 has issued the following statement, which says in part:

"Djibouti values both China and US in East Africa":

China will have its first African naval logistics base by the end of 2017, in Djibouti, on one of the world’s busiest shipping corridors. The objective of this base will be to support the fight against piracy and terrorism, securing the Gulf of Aden alongside international forces from countries including the United States, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, and Japan.

…Over the past few years, China has been increasingly active in our region, working with the US and others as part of this anti-piracy alliance and in support of UN-mandated humanitarian and peacekeeping work across the continent.

Indeed, the Chinese navy has completed twenty missions in the Gulf of Aden, and Chinese naval vessels taking part in these operations use port facilities in Djibouti for supply and service.  In recent weeks, we have concluded a 10-year agreement with the government of China to establish a naval logistical hub in Djibouti to support these operations and make it easier for China to continue its important, burden-sharing role.

Some commentators have questioned our decision to allow China to establish this new naval base.  Our response is, we welcome China’s engagement with anti-piracy and humanitarian work in our region. It is an important contribution to the multilateral effort.  And we want to do what we can to facilitate it. We consider China to be another strategic ally, alongside the U.S. and other forces, in the fight against terrorism and piracy, which are significant threats to the international community and the global economy. See WHOLE STATEMENT at The Hill.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like the US since 1898 China is projecting power into seas and oceans as this is important for strategic and trade reasons. 

The New York Times via Hamilton Spectator, November 26, 2015 reports in part

“Strategically, Djibouti offers an excellent place from which to protect oil imports from the Middle East that traverse the Indian Ocean on their way to China, military experts say. From Djibouti, China gains greater access to the Arabian Peninsula.

The U.S. military has praised China's participation in the international anti-piracy operations, which protect vital commercial shipping in a volatile part of the world. 

Shen Dingli, a professor of international relations at Fudan University in Shanghai, who has argued vigorously that China should develop bases commensurate with its growing military power, said Thursday that in doing so, China would only be doing what America had done. "The United States has been expanding its business all around the world and sending its military away to protect those interests for 150 years," Shen said. "Now, what the United States has done in the past, China will do again."

Shen, who referred to the planned facility in Djibouti as a "base," said it was necessary because "we need to safeguard our own navigational freedom," 

[China needs] to protect 1 to 2 million Chinese citizens living in Africa. This year, China's navy evacuated several hundred Chinese citizens and foreign nationals from war-torn Yemen, routing them through Djibouti for their journeys home.

In a recent paper for the National Defense University in Washington, Christopher D. Yung, an expert on China's military, argued that the country was intent on shouldering more international responsibilities involving its military and in turn would need "dual-use facilities" that could accommodate commercial and military operations.

Until now, he wrote, China had relied on commercial aircraft and ships to maintain its anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden, but they were expensive and inadequate for the Chinese navy. "China needs to expand beyond its current temporary bases," Yung wrote.


Cutaway and weapons (including up to 36 land attack cruise missiles) of Chinese PLA-N Type 052C destroyer. 052s have been used on anti-piracy patrols in the Indian Ocean. (Courtesy Pakistani defence forum)

Pete

December 9, 2015

Putin's Submarine Cruise Missile Party

 Its suspicious, in this Youtube footage, why the camera is so far from the launches. The footage in the above Youtube and this one - (freeze video frame at 6 seconds) seems to show that the submarine is firing the Kalibr-PL cruise missiles while surfaced! If so this is not a true submerged submarine launch achieved by US SSNs or SSGNs or UK SSNs.
--- 

Putin, on December 8, 2015, has gone to the trouble of launching Kalibr cruise missiles from improved Kilo class submarine Rostov-on-Don for a variety of reasons:

-  testing is an addition way to launch cruise missiles under operational conditions. Putin could have launched the Kalibrs by surface ship or ground launched but chose submarine launched because the opportunity presented and because it would be noticed.

-  Russia could have used the existing method of fighter-bombers dropping bombs on the targets in Syria. In that sense perhaps the submarine launch is a form of protest against Turkey shooting down a Russian fighter-bomber on November 24, 2015.

-  using weapons under operational conditions irons out technical bugs, organisational chain of command and targetting bugs and reveals any technical upgrades/capabilities that may be necessary.

-  the submarine launch event would be noticed by the Russian public and military/intelligence establishment who still seek vengeance for the IS organised downing of the Russian airliner (Oct 31, 2015)

-  and noticed by the Western military and potential customers for Kalibrs (with a range exceeding the MTCR) or MTCR compliant (not exceeding 300 km range Klub-S 3M-14E - DOD SS-N-30B's)

-  Putin wants the Russian military to be respected by the West as a modern, efficient military.

-  as the Western military have been surface and submarine launching Tomahawk cruise missiles against Middle East targets since 1991 Russia needs to be seen to have the same right. Russia wants to be seen as a legitimate World Policemen in the same way as the US sees itself.

-  It is suspicious why the camera is so far from the launches. The footage in the above Youtube and this one - (freeze video frame at 6 seconds) seems to show that the submarine is firing the missiles while surfaced. If so this is not a true submerged submarine launch. Note that Russian reports - including Putin's organ RT don't mention "submerged" launching.

-  It is a propaganda/PR victory as was Russia's earlier highly publicised cruise missile launches by Caspian Sea ships (Oct 7, 2015). Obama does not appear willing to highlight missiles strikes by the US or its Western allies in the Middle East - thus Western propaganda opportunities are lost. Obama's relatively peaceful moderation wins him few friends.

-  According to a combined report from the major agencies of the US intelligence community (CIA, NSA and DIA) the coalition is losing in its war against ISIS. It is understood Obama doesn't want to be seen as a Dubya-like warmaker but Obama aims to leave office in February 2017 with his moderate-liberal reputation intact. Obama's scrupulously clean Presidency may be at the expense of losing ground to terrorism. Obama needs to look beyond his reputation and beyond the countdown to his exit. Obama need not go down in history as too much like fellow lame duck Democrat Jimmy Carter.

-  For the planners of the future Australian submarine the firing of cruise missiles from a potential enemy SSK stands as a further reason that Australian future subs should be fitted from the beginning with Tomahawk cruise missiles rather than being retrofitted or on a "for but not with" basis. Note that SSKs of other countries in Australia's region (ie. Vietnam, China and India) also have land attack capable cruise missiles fitted (or about to be).

The Rostov-on-Don Improved Kilo Class submarine has fired the first missiles (Kalibr cruise missiles on December 8, 2015) "in anger" of any Russian (or preceding Soviet) submarine. (Photo courtesy Vitaliy Ankov/Sputnik via RT).

Pete

December 8, 2015

Mother Ships and Rocket Planes - Part One

Rockets have nothing to do with submarines but they're exciting and dangerous - be they government sponsored or corporate.



The Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet was a German rocket-powered fighter aircraft. Test flown Hanna Reitsch and others. The Me 163 was the only operational rocket-powered fighter aircraft used. Although revolutionary and capable of performance unrivaled at the time, it proved ineffective as a fighter and resulted in the destruction of very few Allied aircraft. 

The Me 163's explosive fuel (see above Youtube 2 minutes in) was also extremely toxic when touching organic material eg. the pilot (2:30)! When Germany was running out of experienced pilots the 163s also needed expert piloting to hit bombers at closing speeds of up to 900 mph for head-on attacks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHUCK YEAGER



Rockets revolutionised test piloting. The Youtube above depicts Chuck Yeager breaking the Mach 1/sound barrier in the film The Right Stuff

The Bell X-1 was built for speed, breaking the sound barrier just over 2 years after WWII.

The mothership was a B-50 (with more powerful and reliable engines than a B-29). 

On the ground, no one had ever heard a sonic boom before. 

When it rattled the photographs of the test pilots who had died it was assumed that Yeager was now dead and there would be yet another funeral for another forgotten test pilot. 

It took a few moments for everyone to realize the sound barrier had finally been broken and the Space Age was possible.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apollo 11 in 1969 needs no introduction.


After the White Knight Two - VSS Enterprise crash see Youtube on October 31, 2014 Virgin's Richard Branson may be turning to a safer project (with no passengers) (below).

Richard Branson is developing the 747 booster rocket combination "Launcher One". The system is mainly designed to boost Low Earth Orbiting satellites but perhaps could carry payloads to space stations.

Pete