May 20, 2026

Australia to start production of the Kongseberg Naval Strike Missiles, which has being denied to Malaysia


HMAS Sydney fires Royal Australian Navy’s first Naval Strike Missile during a SINKEX off the coast of Oahu, Hawaii as part of Exercise Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) 2024. Credit: LSIS Daniel Goodman, Defence Australia ---


Kongseberg Defence and Aerospace has been making the news in recent weeks as its Naval Strike Missile (NSM) and Joint Strike Missile (JSM) derivative gathers increasing popularity around the world. But this has also highlighted the current issues nations such as Australia are facing with America's increasingly restrictive International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

On 14 May 2026, Australia announced a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Norwegian government to domestically manufacture the NSM and JSM in Australia, making Australia a regional missile production and support hub for the popular cruise missile.


This MoU will see Australia invest A$850 million to set up production and maintenance facilities in Newcastle, New South Wales, from 2027, and contribute to Australia’s push for self-reliance in defence.


The Royal Australian Navy (RAN) selected the NSM to replace its obsolete Harpoon Block II ASMs on its major surface combatants in 2022, and the first NSM system was integrated on the Horbat-class destroyer HMS Sydney by June 2024. The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) ordered the JSM in September 2024.

Germany orders more JSM

F-35A launching JSM. Credit: Kongsberg
---


Following up on the Australian announcement, Kongsberg announced a futther order for the JSM with Germany, worth NOK3.5 billion (about USD377 million). JSM is a critical system for the F-35, as it is currently the only precision-strike missile that fits the F-35A/C's internal weapons bay.

Norway revokes Malaysia's export license for NSM, citing new export controls

Naval Strike Missile. Credit: Kongsberg
---

Malaysia was the fifth country to order the NSM in 2018 and is now seeking compensation of US$250 million for its NSM order after the Norwegian government revoked its export license, citing new export control measures.


The NSM was selected in 2018 as the main anti-ship missile system of the much-delayed Maharaja Lela-class Littoral Combat Ships (LCS), and Malaysia has paid 95% of the contract value. According to USNI News, Norwegian officials informed the Malaysian Defence Minister Khaled Nordin that new export controls have limited NSM sales to NATO and NATO partner nations, and Malaysia is not a NATO partner nation, unlike Australia.


USNI News also speculates that the NSM uses a US-made gyroscope component that is subject to US International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). This has become increasingly restrictive and "America First" in recent years. Which is one of the reasons why Australia is investing in its defence industry, so it is rather ironic that in the same week the NSM contributes to Australia's quest for defence self-reliance, it also hampers Malaysia's self-defense.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

As China becomes more aggressive, anti-ship missiles are in increasing demand.

Why the Philippines wants Japan’s old Type 88 missiles:

https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3354091/why-philippines-wants-japans-old-type-88-missiles

Pete2 said...

Hi Anonymous at 5/21/2026 3:00 AM

I'm now seeing the Hong Kong based South_China_Morning_Post as a media now part influenced by Beijing interests. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Morning_Post

It is the SCMP my sitemeter registers as much more likely to visit Submarine Matters than mainland China entities. Sort of a neutral Chinese window to the world.

https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3354091/why-philippines-wants-japans-old-type-88-missiles mainly looks neutral but hints at Japanese and Filipino independence from the strong ties with the US that existed in times past.

Regards Pete

Shawn C said...

Greetings Pete,

After the riots of 2019-2020, SCMP has been very CCCP leaning in the flavour of its defense articles, which is understandable considering they are owned by Alibaba since 2016. Their defense reporters are quite good as an English language source for articles related to official PLAN announcements, with a pinch of salt needed for jingoism.

Note that WP has been owned by Bezos since 2013, and Australians are quite used to this as Uncle Rupert owns Fox, Sky (neither of whom I watch for news) and 60% of Australian newspapers.

Oh, the Malaysians actually ordered the Rokestan ATMACA in April 2026 for their upcoming Littoral Mission Ship (LMS) being built by Turkish company STM, so it's very likely they will switch to this ASM to 'replace' the NSM.

Ununennium ❁ said...

Hello Pete!
Commenting after years here! (Biswajit Pattanaik)I hope you are well and healthy!
Thought this might be of some interest to you: https://x.com/mason_8718/status/2057164390336717280
If it happens, Japan will also jump into action.
And how much you think, Australia will be willing to buy SK SSN? If that's even possible! And is there any real support for such deviation, within the Aussie Government or within the RAN Ranks?
AUKUS seems still so far!

Pete2 said...

Hi Shawn at 5/21/2026 8:06 PM

Naturally I put blame for the rough treatment of Malaysia's quest for the Naval Strike Missile (NSM) (which carries some US technology) down to the the US. The Trump-Hegseth Administration now world famous for negative/restrictive defence trade technology measures ("sledgehammer diplomacy"). This is rather than anything eternally blameless Australia did (except for deserting Malaysia to the Japanese in 1942 and attacking Turkey at Gallipoli in 1915).

Malaysia has been realistic in probably opting for Türkiye's Rokestan ATMACA missile ( https://www.roketsan.com.tr/en/products/atmaca-anti-ship-missile ) in April 2026 for Malaysia's upcoming Littoral Mission Ship (LMS) being built by Turkish company STM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Littoral_Mission_Ship_Batch_2_(Malaysia)

Yes likely Malaysia may switch to the Rokestan ATMACA to 'replace' the NSM. If Malaysia also opted for India's BrahMos missile it may make the LMS and Frigates even more formidable.

Regards Pete

Pete2 said...

Welcome back Biswajit-Ununennium ❁ at 5/22/2026 5:50 PM

There is so little info on South Korea's SSN plans since the first announcement the US and SK were negotiating a project. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2026/02/why-koreas-nuclear-powered-submarine-matters-to-us.html

I will contact Australia's Department of Defence to see how willing Australia is to cancel AUKUS Pillar 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUKUS#Pillar_1_%E2%80%93_Nuclear-powered_submarines in favour of a perhaps more realistic SSN-South Korea and I will report back to you.

Cheers Pete

Anonymous said...

French « anonymous »
My understanding ,from little info I have found is that Korean SSN reactor tech is very similar to F one(LEU,planar fuel,although the chemistry of the U loaded plates might be different,very compact,engineered for quick fuel change..) and piggy back on the civilian cycle and safety
However contrarily to Japan or Franceor many countries having civilian N infra,K is dependant ,by treaty and industrially ,for even LEU and for the retreatment from theUS
This is not exactly a done deal,any export of K SSN is also likely to be « scrutinized « 

Ununennium ❁ said...

Thanks for the quick reply!
Appreciate for both the links!
"Geelong Treaty, a 50-year bilateral defence agreement to facilitate bilateral cooperation on the construction of Australia's SSN-AUKUS submarines."
This seems a major thing to me!
Also this time the noise about SSN from South Korea, is a bit loud, but lets see how it pans out.
Interesting comments by Former Prime Minister of Australia Malcolm Turnbull regarding AUKUS to Chatham House (Chatham House, is seen as Unofficial channel for UK Government views & what not).
Here are the links: https://x.com/ChathamHouse/status/2057567107991396637 (Specifically about AUKUS)
And the full video: https://www.chathamhouse.org/events/all/standard-event/australian-model-navigating-us-china-divide-malcolm-turnbull?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=organic-social&utm_campaign=event&utm_content=turnbull

Shawn C said...

Hi Pete,

Malaysia does not recognise the state of Israel, and is the ‘most vocal’ of ASEAN nations regarding the current situation in Palestine, plus the Malaysian King attended the recent Russian Victory Day parade, so it is not a country that the Donald is particular happy with, especially as PM Anwar Ibrahim came out looking better in the recent Thai-Cambodian flare ups.

https://www.alestiklal.net/en/article/how-malaysia-became-a-major-target-for-israeli-cyber-attacks