http://sofrep.com/46403/south-koreas-hidden-strategic-value-for-the-u-s-in-afghanistan/?doing_wp_cron=1453598283.7720980644226074218750
About subs, military/naval, missiles, nuclear weapons & politics. New Aussie subs have been just talk since 2009. Collins LOTE 2028-2040? of partial help. UUVs help more. POTUS may cancel AUKUS Virginias in 2031 as the USN needs all SSNs to the 2040s. Australian Gov ignores US higher priority to Columbia SSBNs (one/year being commissioned 2029-2041). Meaning minimal Virginia production until 2043. Shawn C and Gessler are excellent authors.
SILEX & other Laser Enrichment
January 24, 2016
South Korea’s Hidden Strategic Value for US in Afghanistan
Submarine cables and thick landline cables are of great (and unsung) value to America's dispersed military functioning - see:
http://sofrep.com/46403/south-koreas-hidden-strategic-value-for-the-u-s-in-afghanistan/?doing_wp_cron=1453598283.7720980644226074218750
http://sofrep.com/46403/south-koreas-hidden-strategic-value-for-the-u-s-in-afghanistan/?doing_wp_cron=1453598283.7720980644226074218750
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
I wonder why would US DoD runs a 622Mbps optical link across China. Even with long range optics, you will need plenty of repeaters for the PLA to listen in (if the network diagram is correct)?
Truth is you cannot run a private fiber link across China unless it is owned by China Telecom. Besides 622Mbps is to low for a trunk which is always in the 40G or 100G. Could it be that US DoD is leasing 622Mbps from a Korean provider like KT or SK, which is then conceivably routed as a lambda (wavelength) over a China Telecom fiber network. That is very strange given the sensitive information that is carried.
KQN
Hi KQN
I don't know enough about landlines in east Asia to positively respond.
Regards
Pete
Post a Comment