The decline in US SSN numbers until 2043 will prevent US second-hand SSNs being sold to Australia in the 2030s and severely limit Submarine Rotational Force numbers at HMAS Stirling in the 2030s. Australia is embarking on confusing A$multi-billion plans in the southern Perth area mainly for rare AUKUS submarines from the US and UK.
Plans include Australia spending around "$25 billion over a decade" to upgrade the Henderson shipbuilding and maintenance precinct in southern Perth, Western Australia. This, in part. aims to service SSNs. See https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-13/albanese-announces-aukus-12-billion-dollar-defence-spend-perth/105770188
Australia is also spending a minimum of A$8 Billion to expand its submarine base (aka HMAS Stirling or Fleet Base West) south of Perth - money which is also going into housing for US and UK personnel and their families. The base expansion is for handling "up to" 4 US attack submarines (SSNs) and a UK Astute SSN. This is the vaunted "Submarine Rotational Force" project, under AUKUS. See https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-12/inside-the-aukus-plan-to-station-american-subs-near-perth/105763818
Note - there have been loose, slow motion, rotations (or visits) of US SSNs through HMAS Stirling since 2005, if not before.
But if we build more facilities will more subs come?
US submarine numbers will decline until at least 2043. This is tied to completion of the final US Columbia class SSBN. The Columbias are dominating US submarine production until 2042. The mathematics are each of these higher priority, much larger, Columbias require the US production effort of 2.5 standard Virginias. See Industrial-Base Challenges of Building Both Columbia- and Virginia-Class Boats at https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R41129 and endnote 37 at https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R41129 .
The US has made major efforts to lift submarine production and maintenance for more than a decade. But the inability to attract enough skilled labour, as well as supply chain inefficiencies, has stymied these efforts.
All this means that unless the US partly transfers SSNs from US territory, like Guam, there will be no US submarines available for higher tempo rotation through HMAS Stirling, until 2043.
Then there is the UK promise, under AUKUS, that Astute class SSNs can spend more time being rotated through HMAS Stirling. This is even less likely. The UK usually has available only two, or more often, one operational Astute(s). Due to reactor and other quality control problems the Astutes have a low rate of availability.
The main mission of these one or two operational Astutes is to protect UK SSBN patrol activity in the Atlantic. The UK has little margin of safety to increase the rare Astute rotations (really just short visits) through HMAS Stirling.
So on top of the unlikelihood of buying US and UK SSNs this side of 2045, a significant uptick in rotations through Australia is yet another hugely expensive AUKUS gamble.
With the Ghost Shark XL-AUV entering full production, Fleet Base West is the ideal (only?) centralised base for dedicated Indian Ocean operations.
ReplyDeleteWith the speed this project has been implemented, I’m wondering if it’s seen as a Collins replacement?
https://www.anduril.com/article/ghost-shark-enters-program-of-record-from-prototype-to-fleet-in-three-years/
Hi Shawn at 9/12/2025 7:46 PM
ReplyDeleteGHOST SHARK, as it is unmanned and slow moving, can supplement, rather than replace Collins and SSN operations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_Shark_(submarine)
To achieve multi-1,000nm oceanic range an enlarged/extended GHOST SHARK (GS) might only move at 3 to 4 kts. Compared to 10kts Collins (submerged, with snorkel) and about 25kts for an SSN (30kts for days/weeks causes too much wear and tear).
Unmanned GS can be remotely ordered to deploy smart mines - mines switched on in times of war and selectively target. Doctrine, technologies and legalities for GS to "safely" target enemy vessels with torpedoes or missiles, isn't fully mature yet.
Reconnaissance, signals interception (near shore) and towing sonar arrays may be GS main strengths.
Cheers Pete
Meanwhile, India's submarine programs continue to advance:
ReplyDelete"While L&T partnered with Navantia to offer the S80 for P75I, MDL tied up with
TKMS and got selected to offer a design which can be described as a Type
214I. TKMS and MDL announced commencement of official contract
negotiations for P75(I). P75I is a successor to P75 as planned in the 1990s. All
six Kalvari class Scorpene submarines under P75 have been inducted, with
efforts to integrate an AIP by DRDO and L&T facing delays. While the original
plans as mooted during the conception of P75 were delayed and changed, the
more recent plan to integrate the first submarine INS Kalvari with a domestic
AIP plug has also been delayed. Currently, the second submarine INS Khanderi
is likely to be fitted with the plug in 2026-27. The energy module is slated to be
ready by December 2025 which then has to be integrated with a plug and
inserted in the SSK during refit. New heavyweight torpedoes by DRDO will also
be integrated."
See:
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/09/indian-navys-indigenous-submarine-programs-gather-steam/
Thanks Anonymous at 9/16/2025 5:58 AM
ReplyDeleteFor more than a decade SubMatts has been reporting India's rolling SSK plan game. This may be India's response to China - China only reports real achievements of new submarines operational.
I'll report when Indian SSKs with AIP are commissioned .
Cheers Pete
Onboard an Indian Type 214:
DeleteSonar officer: "Sir, Rankin is leaving port. Left engine still sounds akward."
Captain: "Nothing new. - Captain speaking: we will return to Mumbai in about two hours."
I hope you'll still report then the next Australian submarine will be commissioned.
Regards,
MHalblaub
Thanks Matthias
ReplyDeleteFor your Collins class HMAS Rankin dialog.
On when the next Australian submarine will be commissioned. I'd say 2045. It may be a hypersonic missile armed Virginia, SSN-AUKUS or Osborne built SSK.
Cheers Pete