India's
Bharat Express News December 14, 2021 carries the New York Times (NYT) December 13, 2021 article "South Korea has long wanted nuclear submarines. A new reactor could open a door." without readers having to subscribe to NYT. NYT's article is reproduced by Bharat Express here https://www.thebharatexpressnews.com/south-korea-has-long-wanted-nuclear-submarines-a-new-reactor-could-open-a-door/
SUBMARINE MATTERS BACKGROUND AND COMMENT
South Korea is leaning toward a LEU reactor solution perhaps initially on a South Korea SSBN - which will be based around the ballistic missile submarine KSS-III SSB. It is not surprising South Korea has long been in talks with France (since 2017 if not earlier) about South Korea building a variant of France's K15 LEU reactor. The K15 is on France's Triomphant class SSBNs and, in slightly smaller form, on the France's Barracuda-Suffren class SSNs.
In Submarine Matters’ “South Korea seeks Submarine Reactors from US and RUSSIA” of October 22, 2019 South Korea may have concluded it is better to buy an existing submarine reactor or at least a ship reactor than totally reinvent a submarine reactor.
Since 2017 (if not earlier) South Korea has been considering France’s new Barracuda SSN with its K15 (aka K 15 aka K-15) reactor. With North Korea's buildup of nuclear weapon and missile capabilities South Korea, in October 2019, has been testing any increased US willingness for South Korea to explore nuclear propulsion options.
The Triomphant-class's 2(?) x K15s and Barracuda's single K15 reactor stands for 150 MWt power which translates to a total of 30 MWe electrical power (for the French Barracuda’s non-propulsive electrical services hotel load + propulsion).
"In October 2017, the [South Korean] Navy commissioned the Seoul-based Korea Defense Network to conduct a five month study on the feasibility of developing an indigenous nuclear-powered attack submarine. The think tank reported in March 2018 the results to the Navy, suggesting the service build a nuclear attack submarine along the lines of the French 5,300-ton Barracuda-class sub. The French sub is fueled by low-enriched uranium."
- technical advantage of being built for a submarine of just over 5,000 tons, ie. in South Korea's KSS III Bach III weight bracket. While the KSS III Batch II with 10 x VLS silos has diesel-electric (also AIP) propulsion the proposed KSS III Batch III may eventuall have 12 to 16 VLS silos requiring an unusually large propulsion solution. Nuclear has been the solution for SSBNs built by the US, Russia, UK, France, China and India.
- So a A K15 variant first mounted on a South Korean SSBN by the early 2030s may be followed by mounting a K15 reactor variant on a South Korean SSN by the mid 2030s. In terms of vertically launched cruise or ballistic missiles the KSS Batch I features 6 VLS tubes, each with one missile. The KSS III Batch II may feature 10 and the KSS III Batch III perhaps 12 to 16.
India, already having SSBNs, is interested in building 6 x Project 75 Alpha class SSNs with specialised SSN reactors. India is naturally talking to France's Naval Group. Naval Group is already helping India build the 6 Kalvari-class Scorpenes, and bidding for India's 6 x AIP diesel-electric Project-75I SSK competition. Naval Group produces all of France's SSNs and SSBNs. So India can have far ranging discussions, on many topics, with Naval Group.
You're probably already aware of this, but just in case not, there is a comprehensive new (14 Dec) report from the ASPI re AUKUS Sub program:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.aspi.org.au/report/implementing-australias-nuclear-submarine-program
I'm still digesting it all...
Also, everyones favorite submarine artist, Messr Sutton, has produced this speculative gem of a SK KSS-3(N).
ReplyDeletehttps://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/12/south-koreas-first-nuclear-submarine-looks-closer/
I'm baffled why VLS would be between reactor and drive machinery.
Hi Clive
ReplyDeleteYes. Splitting the reator/propulsion machinery into 2 compartments would also force the propulsion engineering crew to decide which of the 2 compartments they are effectively restricted to.
The VLS compartment (especially if it mounts nuclear tipped ballistic missiles + ever present explosive rocket fuel) is a restricted area that should not get caught up in reactor radiation complications, high pressure steam hazards and high temperature diesel electric backup sparks or fires.
Also the propulsion crew are ordinarally only permitted to cross a ballistic missile compartment 2 to 4 times a day from the main forward sleeping/eating compartment of the sub. A propulsion compartment on each side of the missile compartment would be bad for security.
It is quite obvious that LEU "à la K15" is the natural solution and is probably in the works
ReplyDelete-SK has not weapon grade HEU capabilities
-The SK nuclear industry is very robust, very similar, if not identical in the fuel cycle, to the French one ,with 30 years+ of collaboration and initial 2 French plants built.It has N fuel production and a disposal programm
The last ,2020,technical agreementn centered around the safe automated dismantling..
A similar situation exist in Japan where the spent fuel is reprocessed in France and the mixed oxydes fuel shipped back for further production at KEPCO
KHNP is the chief competitor of ORANO /EDF
The real issue is whether SK will do it alone or with a French supply/licence..
TKMS gave a licence to SK for the 209...not for export..apparently