Following "Huge Study on Lithium-ion Batteries (LIBs) for Submarines" of December 16, 2019 Anonymous has kindly written a Third Review of Lithium-ion Battery (LIB) arrangements. The Second Review was not published. Changes are in pink. The main revisions are as follows:
Anonymous
1.
Detail
description of LIBs for Russian submarine including Kilo-class. Figs. 8 and 9
were added.
2.
Description
of LIBs for Japanese submarine.
3.
Addition of
Energy density in Table 3 and
4.
Format and
expressions were changed to accord Submarine Matters' usage.
No patents on
NCA by Japanese company GS-YUASA could be found. No information on sales and manufacturing
of NCA by GS-YUASA could be found.
Anonymous thinks
GS-YUASA buys NCA batteries or has a manufacturing license approved by the Japanese Ministry of Defense (MOD). If that is the case, the NCA supplier/licensor (X ) needs the following:
i) X has patents of NCA, is
manufacturing NCA and has enough technology.
ii) X has a strong and stable financing
(big company),
iii) X is relied by MOD (X has been
reliable Japanese supplier of MOD),
iv) there is a reliable relationship between
X and GS-YUASA. A company that satisfies
conditions i) - iii) is only Panasonic as
far as Anonymous knows.
A few years ago, Panasonic sold all LABs sections to GS-YUASA making it the biggest LAB manufacturer in Japan. From these facts, Anonymous believes Panasonic offers NCA technology to GS-YUASA.
In this Third Review below recent information on LIBs in Submarine Matters are reviewed with additional new insights, and
they are summarized. Battery cells suitable for submarine are estimated from
published data, and battery modules and battery groups are also estimated.
Finally, energy of battery is estimated. As many assumptions are used, the estimations
in this contribution might sometimes be different from fact.
Summary (of possible adoption of
Lithium-ion Batteries (LIBs) in future submarine classes):
- In
current AIP submarines which have Lead-acid Batteries (LABs), the energy of LIBs
is considerably lower than for non-AIP submarine (like Soryu/29SS). Soryu/29SS
will show best performance at high speed (Table 4).
- The
LIBs in future South Korean 2000t (eg.
the DSME 2000) and 3000t (eg. The KSS-III
Batch 2) subs will generate higher energy at ever lower cost. The 2000t
submarine will become a strong competitor of the future Type 214-LIB (which may
have LIBs).
- In
the TKMS Type 212CD and Italian
built Type 212NSF, non-magnetic
hulls and minimal magnetic field created by batteries will be important. For
those subs the width of a battery group is narrow to make variation of vertical
position of battery groups small.
- Australia’s
future Attack-class may adopt bigger
battery groups than Type 212CDs. If
Naval Group fully adopt LIBs in the early 2020s, then possible NAVAL Group Shortfin for - Walrus replacement and future LIB-Scorpene may precede an Attack class equipped with LIBs - with
all Naval Group classes adopting the same LIBs battery groups. If the future
Attack-class retains LABs then this may be a waste of time and money.
- Numbers
and energy (192pieces, 6.1MWh) of LIBs for China’s Yuan 039B is significantly
smaller than reported ones (960 pieces, 32MWh). WB-LYP10000AHA shows excellent performance as
Iron Phosphate based battery.
- Energy
level of LIBs (if adopted) for Lada/Amur-class is as same as Western
counterparts.[This is noting that Russia has made so little progress with AIP
(for Ladas/Amurs in 20 years) that Russia may upgrade future Ladas/Amurs
instead]. As Kilo-class
is a proven subamerine at a reasonable price, LIB-Kilo is an attractive choice than
Amur-class for some countries.
- SAAB-DAMEN
equips with bigger [heavier] LIBs to satisfy Netherland Navy requirements [for more energy in its 3,000 ton A26s
to replace the Walrus's].
- Currently,
safety (=no hydrogen generation) and better maintenance of LIBs are emphasized
rather than increase in energy except Soryu/29SS (see SORYU TABLE).
Figure
1
While
voltage of LAB is 2V and all of LABs are directly connected to produce high
voltage, voltage of LIB is much higher (nominal voltage : 3.2-3.7V) and
combination of direct and parallel connection is adopted in LIBs. Favorable numbers of battery groups and
battery strings are multiples of four (4, 8, 12, etc.) for minimization of
stray magnetic field.
Stern
Series connection of
battery groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Starboard
|
Figure
1 Battery group arrangement and its connection
for LIB-submarine
Table 1
Definition of terms
Term
|
Definition
|
Battery
|
A parallel circuit composed of battery
groups (blue area surrounded by double solid lines in Fig.1).
|
Battery string
|
A series of battery groups;
|
Battery group
|
A parallel circuit composed of battery
lines (blue area surrounded by single solid lines in Fig.1),
|
Battery line
|
A series circuit composed of individual
battery cells
|
Asubmarine
has one battery or two batteries. Favorable numbers of battery groups and
battery strings are multiples of four (4, 6,
12, etc.) for minimization of indiscrete stray magnetic fields [that enemy sensors may detect. Stray magnetic fields
may also adversely effect electrical/electronic equipment in a submarine].
Figure 1 is a battery consisted of 8 battery strings where a battery string
consists of 8 battery groups.
Table
2 Lithium ion battery cells for
LIB-submarine
Lithium ion battery
cells are listed in Table 2. The battery cells of FAAM and SAFT are square and
others are cylindrical. Square battery cell shows higher efficiency than
cylindrical one. Polymer (PO), LFP (lithium ion phosphate), LYP (lithium Ytterium)
show higher safety. The
best battery cell of the manufacturer is used for submarine.
SAMSUNG SDI shows high
performance and excellent price by adopting commercial battery cells for EV (Electric Vhicle). As a
reference, Russian latest square type cell (Liotech, LT-LFP72) is introduced. Energy density of LT-LYP (Yttrium added LFP)770 is lower than
LT-LFP72[14].
Cell
name
|
Make
|
Type
|
D
|
W
|
H
or L
|
Weight
|
Voltage
|
Capacity
|
Energy
density *6
|
Ref
|
mm
|
mm
|
mm
|
kg
|
V
|
Ah
|
Wh/kg
|
||||
SLPB160460330H
|
Kokam
|
NMC PO (*1)
|
14.8
|
462
|
327
|
4.58
|
3.7
|
200
|
164
|
1
|
SLPB160460330
|
Kokam
|
NMC PO
|
15.8
|
462
|
327
|
4.51
|
3,7
|
240
|
197
|
1
|
94Ah
|
SAMSUNG SDI
|
Prismatic NCM
|
45
|
173
|
125
|
2.01
|
3.68
|
94
|
174
|
4
|
111Ah
|
SAMSUNG SDI
|
Prismatic NCM
|
45
|
173
|
125
|
2.01
|
3.68
|
111
|
204
|
5,6
|
-
|
FAAM
|
LFP
|
63
(*3)
|
-
|
225
|
1.51
|
3.2
|
65
|
139
|
7
|
-
|
GS-YUASA
|
NCA
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3.6
|
-
|
250
(*2)
|
|
NCA103450
(*2)
|
Panasonic
|
NCA
|
10.5
|
33.8
|
48.5
|
0.0383
|
3.6
|
2.35
|
220
|
20
|
SCiB™ 20Ah
|
Toshiba
|
LTO
|
22
|
116
|
106
|
0.515
|
2.38
|
20
|
89.3
|
8
|
SCiB™ 23Ah
|
Toshiba
|
LTO
|
22
|
116
|
106
|
0.55
|
2.38
|
23
|
96.1
|
8
|
VL56E (*2)
|
SAFT
|
LFP
|
54.1
(*2)
|
-
|
244
(*4)
|
1.17
|
3.3
|
56
|
158
|
10
|
LT-LFP 72 (*5)
|
Liotech
|
LFP
|
135
|
30
|
222
|
=
or less than 1.8
|
3.2
|
72
|
130
|
14
|
*1 Lithium polymer battery
*2 General data of NCA (Lithium Nickel Aluminum)
*3 Diamter
*4 Estimation by using SAFT VL48E
and VL52LE
*5 The third generation LFP.
Liotech is Russian Lithium ion battery maker.
*6 Energy = Capacity x Vlotage,
Energy density =Energy/weight
*7
There is no information on NCA by GS-YUASA. Panasonic NCA103450 is introduced
as a reference instead.
Table
3 Lithium ion battery modules (single
module) for LIB-submarine
Various factors including diameter
of submarine hatch, curvature
of pressure hull, dimension and location of batteries, numbers of battery
groups and battery modules (4, 8, 12, etc.), and size and performance of
battery cell are considered to decide architecture of battery modules.
Details of SAFT-TKMS battery
group are not reported, but, its footprint is expected to resemble FAAM battery
group. SAFT-NAVAL battery group is hypothetical model based on SAFT-TKMS battery group.
WB-LYP10000AHA will be exchanged
through larg hatch, not hatch for crew. If WB-LYP10000AHA has two layers-strucure,
then, number of cells is 22. Yttrium is a rare earth element and the major producing
country is China.
Module
name
|
Make
|
Cell
name
|
Cell
|
D
|
W
|
H
|
Weight
|
Voltage
|
Capacity
|
Energy
|
Energy density
|
Ref
|
number-
|
mm
|
mm
|
mm
|
kg
|
V
|
Ah
|
kWh
|
Wh/kg
|
||||
Green Orca
|
Floattech
|
SLPB160460330H
|
14
|
542
|
335
|
541
|
82
|
51.8
|
200
|
10.3
|
126
|
2
|
Green Orca
|
Floattech
|
SLPB160460330
|
14
|
542
|
335
|
541
|
80
|
51.8
|
240
|
12.4
|
155
|
3
|
M8994 E2 (*1)
|
94Ah
|
24
|
370
|
588
|
160
|
Less than
60
|
88.3
|
94
|
8.39
|
138
|
5,6
|
|
E3-090
|
111Ah
|
24
|
370
|
588
|
160
|
Less
than 60
|
88.3
|
111
|
9.91
|
163
|
5,6
|
|
-
|
FAAM
|
-
|
24
|
252
|
378
|
225
|
More
than
36
|
76.8
|
65
|
5.00
|
139
|
7
|
-
|
GS-YUASA
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
178 (*7)
|
|
20Ah 2P12S
|
Toshiba
|
SCiB™
20Ah
|
24
|
360
|
190
|
125
|
14
|
27.6
|
40
|
1.10
|
79
|
9
|
23Ah 2P12S (*2)
|
Toshiba*1
|
SCiB™ 23Ah
|
24
|
360
|
190
|
125
|
15
|
27.6
|
45
|
1.24
|
83
|
|
(*3)
|
SAFT-TKMS
|
VL56E
|
16
|
237
|
586
|
131
|
Less
than
20
|
52.8
|
56
|
2.95
|
148
|
|
(*4)
|
SAFT-NAVAL
|
VL56E
|
24
|
345
|
530
|
131
|
Less
than
30
|
39.6
|
112
|
4.43
|
148
|
|
(*5)
|
Liotech
|
LT-LFP 72
|
36
|
270
|
540
|
222
|
64.8
|
57.2
|
144
|
8.23
|
127
|
19
|
(*6)
|
Winston Battery
|
WB-LYP10000AHA
|
11
|
367
|
687
|
756
|
335
|
3.2
|
10000
|
3210
|
96
|
16
|
*2 Estimation by using various
Toshiba [8,10]
*3 Estimation by using various SAFT
publications and TKMS LIB [11,12,13].
Footprint of SAFT-TKMS is assumed to be as same as FAAM.
*4 This model is hypothetical. Change
battery change through a hatch with diameter of 650-711mm [15], which is
estimated from hatch of Suffren submarine, and cell of
VL56E are considered.
*5
Estimation based on battery arrangement of Kilo-class.
*6
LYP = Lithium Yttrium Iron
Phosphate, WB-LYP10000AHA
shows excellent energy density (185Wh/kg) as Iron Phoshate based battery.
*7 Esimation by using Pnasonic NCA103450 cell, SAMSUNG SDI 111Ah
cell and SAMSUNG SDI
E3-090 module
Figures 2 to 9
Battery modules and battery
groups based on FAAB cell,
latest SAFT VL56E cell and LT LFP 72 cell are proposed in these figures.
Dimension of FAAB battery module is decided based on perspective view of Type
212A and picture of FAAB battery module. The SAFT modules and groups are
assumed to be different from SAFT commercial Flex’ionTM Figures 4&6 and
5&7 correspond to SAFT-TKMS and SAFT-NAVAL, respectively. Improvement of
FAAB and SAFT cylindrical cells to square type cells will provide increase of
energy (e.g., plus 20%).
In
Figures 8 and 9, Lada-class (single hull, beam 7.1m) and Kilo-class (double
hull, dianmeter of inner hull 7.2m) were compared, also LABs arrangement in
Kilo-class (12 x 15 LABs and 8 x 15LABs under diesel and torpedo sections,
respectively) were considered to estimate number and dimension of battery
groups and their arrangement.
W=378mm
|
D=252mm
|
|||||||||||||||||
BTU (*1)
|
BTU
|
H=
ca.1100mm
|
||||||||||||||||
W=378mm
|
D=252mm
|
|||||||||||||||||
H=225mm
|
||||||||||||||||||
Front view
|
Side view
|
Front view
|
Side view
|
|||||||||||||||
Figure 2 Battery module consists of 24 FAAB cells
|
Figure 3 Battery group consists of 4 layers of [24
FAAB cells]-modules
Battery modules (blue solid line) & battery group (double
solid line).
(*1) Battery Management Unit = BMU.
|
W=586mm
|
D=273mm
|
W=530mm
|
D=345mm
|
|||||||
H=
ca.
1200mm
|
BTU
|
BTU
|
H=ca.1200mm
|
BTU
|
BTU
|
|||||
Front view
|
Side view
|
Front view
|
Side view
|
|||||||
Figure 6 Battery group
consists of 8 layers of [16-VL56E cells]-modules.
Battery modules (blue solid line) & battery group (double
solid line) are assumed from pictures of TKMS battery modules and data of
SAFT battery cells/modules.
|
Figure 7 Battery group
consists of 8 layers of [24-VL56E cells]-modules
Structure of battery group (double solid line) is based on
Figure 6 and maximum package of battery modules (blue solid line). Height is
estimated from curvature of pressure
hull and other factors.
|
|
W=540mm
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top view
|
|
D=270mm
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
H=222mm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Front view
|
|
Side view
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Figure 8 Battery module
consists of 36 LT-LFP 72 cells
Number (n) of
battery cell is assumed to be 36, but, n = 34 also is possible. Encloseute is
neglected..
|
|
W=540mm
|
D=270-300mm
|
||
|
BTU
|
|
BTU
|
|
H=1250mm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Front view
|
Side view
|
||
Figure 9 Battery group
consists of 4 [36-LT-LFP 72 cells] modules
Enclosure of battery group is considered.
Diameter of hatch is 650mm. Height of battery group is estimated from perspective
of Kilo-class
|
Table
4 Structures of battery group and energy
of battery for LIB-submarine
Explanation
– Battery Management Unit (BMU) is located on the top of battery group (Table 3
(a)). Adoption of LIBs does not always provide significant increase in absolute
energy of batteries. Increase in actual energy due to bigger depth of discharge
in LIBs (80%), easy maintenance and higher safety without generation of
hydrogen are achieved for LIBs. As output of AIP is not high, increase of LIBs
is important to improve performance of submarine at high speed. Adoption of
optical mast provides improved freedom of sections and arrangement of batteries.
Here batteries are assumed to locate under diesel generator and torpedo
sections.
A Non-AIP
submarine is equipped with larger amounts of LIBs than AIP submarine as shown in the Soryu/29SS
and Kilo. As estimated energy of a LAB battery
group for Kilo-class is 3.36MWh (*11), considerting depth of discharge (DOD,
50% for LABs and 80% for LIBs), energy of LIBs will increase 3.8-4.8 times of
LABs. Kilo-class is a proven submarine with reasonable price. Therefore, LIB-Kilo
may be more attravtive choise than Amur- class, which has unproven AIP and single
hull structure (Russian submarine has double hull structure), for some countries.
a
|
Configura-tion of a battery group:
BMU (Battery Management Unit, ye1low),
battery modules (blue solid line), battery group (double solid line)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b
|
Make
|
GS-YUASA
|
SAMSUNG
SDI
|
SAFT-TKMS
|
SAFT-
NAVAL
|
FAAM
|
Liotech
|
Floattech
|
Winston Battery
|
||||||||||||||||||||
c
|
Submarine builder
|
KHI/MHI
|
HHI(Hyndai Heavy Industries)
|
TKMS
|
NAVAL-ASC
|
FINCAN-TIERI
|
Russia
|
SAAB-DAMEN
|
SAAB
|
China
|
|||||||||||||||||||
d
|
Number of battery modules in a battery
group
|
10
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
4
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
f
|
Voltage of a battery group [V] (*1)
|
36
|
88.3
|
52.8
|
39.6
|
76.8
|
57.4
|
51.8
|
51.8
|
3.2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
g
|
Energy of a battery group
[kWh]
|
86(*10)
|
70.2
(*2)
|
23.6
(*3)
|
35.5
(*4)
|
20.0
|
41.1
|
37.2
(*5)
|
24.8
(*5)
|
32
|
|||||||||||||||||||
h
|
Submarine
|
Soryu/29SS
|
3000t-class
|
2000t-class
|
Type
212CD
|
Attack-class
|
Type
212NFS
|
Kilo (*9) Lada
Amur
|
SAAB-DAMEN
|
A26
|
Type
039B
|
||||||||||||||||||
i
|
Number of batteries
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||
j
|
Number of battery strings
(stern+bow *6)
|
28+28
|
12+12
|
8+8
|
12+12
|
16+12
|
0+24
|
10+15
12+12
8+8
|
8+12
|
8+12
|
8+8
|
||||||||||||||||||
k
|
Number of battery groups in a battery
string (*7)
|
12
|
8
|
8
|
12
|
12
|
8
|
12+8
8
8
|
12
|
8
|
12
|
||||||||||||||||||
l
|
Energy of batteries [MWh]
|
58
|
15.2
|
10.1
|
6.8
|
11.9
|
3.8
|
9.9
7.9
5.3
|
8.9
|
4.0
|
6.1
*8
|
||||||||||||||||||
*1 Guideline of (f) and (j ) is 400V<
(f) x (j) < 800V considering maximum and minimum voltage of battery cell.
*2 SAMSUNG
SDI 111Ah cell and 24-cell module
*3 SAFT VL56E cell and 16-cell
module
*4 SAFT VL56E cell and 24-cell
module
*5 Kokam
SLPB160460330
cell and 14-cell module
*6 Stern and bow batteries are
placed under diesel generator and torpedo sections, respectively for submarines
except Soryu/29SS.
*7 As battery groups and battery
strings are directly and parallel connected, respectively.
*8 As diameter of hatch for exchange of WB-LYP
10000AHA is more than 780mm whitch is too big for crew, WB-LYP 10000AHA may be
exchanged through hatches on the diesel and torpedo sections with 6-7m in
length. Considering that footprint of WB-LYP 10000AHA is 1.32 times bigger than
GS-YUASA LIB, that Type 039B is 80% smaller than AIP-Soryu MKI and that Type
039B is tear-drop type double hull structured, Type 098 may equip with ca. 200
battery groups at most (half of Soryu MKI). So, Type 039 equips two batteries of
6.1MW which considerably smaller than reported [18].
*9
Rubin Design Bereau of Russia is considering LIB – Kilo-class. Kilo-class has
two batteries consist of 240 LABs. Estimated arrangement of LABs is 8 x 15 and
12 x 10 under torpedo and diesel sections. Arrengement of LIBs is expected to
be the same.
*10
Estimation by using Panasonic NCA103450 cel, SAMSUNG SDI 111Ah cell, SAMSUNG
SDI E-30] and its module E3-0903. In the 4 layered battery group (d=4), energy
will be 80% of Table 4 (l).
*11
Size (D540mm x W270mm x H1200mm) and volumetric energy (80kWh/L) are assumed
for LABs.
References
[3] Estimation based on [2]
Capacity [Wh/kg] = 94Ah x 3.68V /
2.01kg = 173Wh/kg
[5] M8994 E2 module
[6] E3-M090 module
A comparison between M8994 E2
module (94Ah) vs E3-M090 module (111Ah) suggests same dimension of 94Ah and
111Ah.
[7] https://www.udt-global.com/media/libraries/sensors-and-processing/116---Vincenzo-Pennino-Slides.pdf
LT-LYP(http://www.enelt.com/?id=530)
is also possible cell for submarine, but, its volumetric energy density is
lower (93Wh/kg) than LT LFP72 (130Wh/kg).
[15] Hatch diameter range of
650-711mm is based on the followings: i) DSRV’s ( Deep
Submergence Rescue Vehicle’s) and SRC (Submarine
Rescue Chamber’s) can accommodate hatches up to 28 inches (=711mm) in diameter [reference here],
page 698, ii) diameter of small hatch of Japanese
submarine are 650mm, and iii) Japanese is smaller than Westerner.
[17] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_039A_submarine Type 039B Length
77.6m, Beam 8.4m, AIP, crew 36, submerged displacement 3600, double hull
structure. 039B (upgraded)
“The battery pack consists of 960 pcs of the WB-LYP10000AHA
cells making the total energy of 31MWh.”
[19] From the
pictures and perspective of battery section in Kilo-class submarine, size of
LAB (D=ca.300mm, W=ca.550mm) and number of battery
group (n=8) were estimated. And sizes of LIBs for Kilo, Lada and Amur-class are
assumed to be same as LABs.
Lithium batteries may see some improvement soon with the addition of Sulfur:
ReplyDelete"By designing a novel robust cathode structure, researchers have now made a lithium-
sulfur battery that can be recharged several hundred times. The cells have an energy
capacity four times that of lithium-ion, which typically holds 150 to 200 watt-hours
per kilogram (Wh/kg). If translatable to commercial devices, it could mean a battery
that powers a phone for five days without needing to recharge, or quadruples the range
of electric cars.
That’s unlikely to happen, since energy capacity drops when cells are strung together
into battery packs. But the team still expects a “twofold increase at battery pack
level when [the new battery is] introduced to the market,” says Mahdokht Shaibani, a
mechanical and aerospace engineer at Australia’s Monash University who led the work
published recently in the journal Science Advances."
See:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/batteries-storage/lithium-sulfur-battery-news-ev-electric-vehicle-range
Hi Anonymous
ReplyDeleteSeveral countries/companies (including the UK's Oxis Energy?) have been looking at the strengths and weaknesses of lithium-sulfur (or sulphur) batteries (LSBs) for submarine for some years. Submarine Matters has appoached this several times over the years.
(A) One is "Alternates Technologies (LTOs and LSBs) to Oryu's NCA Submarine LIBs" October 17, 2018 at https://gentleseas.blogspot.com/2018/10/alternates-technologies-ltos-and-lsbs.html which judged:
"Lithium-Sulfur (or Sulphur) Batteries LSBs are a possible future LIB for submarine technology that may take 20 more years to mature for submarine use. For development of LSBs to maturity, they need extensive testing then placing on the civilian market to establishment a reliability and safety record. LSBs for submarine would need to be produced (by GS Yuasa?) efficiently with adequate return of investment and profit."
(B) [abridged due to blogger comment limits] A more specific, earlier, article was "Li-S or Lithium Sulfer Batteries (LSBs) for Submarine On the Way" June 1, 2015 at http://gentleseas.blogspot.com/2015/06/li-s-or-lithium-sulfer-batteries-lsbs.html including a very useful graph and:
"In late May 2015 “S” and I discussed Lithium Sulphur Batteries (LSBs) in the Comments section.
...LSBs are intended to have a higher energy density than LIBs or, of course, LABs. However the reliability and safety of all battery types in submarines are essential traits...
So LIBs may be the new in-operation batteries for submarine from the 2020s while LSBs may be the next advance in batteries for use from the 2030s.
For Australia...
Probably no-one knows how many years LIBs for submarine will remain efficient. Hence decisions on LSB replacement are far in the future.
Several companies worldwide are researching-developing LSBs. This includes UK company Oxis Energy Ltd. Oxis has provided the diagram above and the description below http://www.oxisenergy.com/technology/ which explains:
"Sulfur represents a natural cathode partner for metallic Li and, in contrast with conventional lithium-ion cells, the chemicals processes include dissolution from the anode surface during discharge and reverse lithium plating to the anode while charging. As a consequence, Lithium-Sulfur allows for a theoretical specific energy in excess of 2700Wh/kg, which is nearly 5 times higher than that of Li-ion.
Oxis’s next generation lithium technology platform offers the highest energy density among lithium chemistry:
- 300 Wh/kg achieved at cell level in 2014 (and) 400 Wh/kg forecast in 2016
Oxis patented chemistry provides inherent safety allowing it to meet international standards concerning shock, crush, thermal stability and short circuit...Thanks to its two key mechanisms, a ceramic lithium sulfide passivation layer and a non-flammable electrolyte, our cells can withstand extreme abuse situations such as bullet and nail penetrations with no adverse reaction."
--------------
Naturally companies need to sell their product and many details need to be worked out with new technologies.
For submarine use batteries need to be very safe (under normal and abnormal conditions) and reliable. Other issues under Australia mission conditions are their: weight; charge speed to minimise indiscretion; rate of self-discharging; memory effect; propensity to surge; discharge rates (speed, volume, percentage); cycle life and operational life; and, degree of maintenance needed.
It would be interesting which German, French and US companies are developing LSBs? Pete"
Don't know if Australia's Lithium-Sulfur Battery (LSB) advocates have fully researched such existing literature as Submarine Matters...Cheers Pete
P.S.
ReplyDeleteUK's Oxis Energy current website https://oxisenergy.com/
"Pioneering patented technology
LITHIUM SULFUR [LI-S]
We are developing an innovative Lithium Sulfur [Li-S] battery chemistry that will revolutionize the rechargeable battery market. With a theoretical energy density 5 times greater than Li-ion, OXIS patented Li-S technology is lighter, safer and maintenance free, and ready to meet the demands of tomorrow.
NEXT GENERATION BATTERY TECHNOLOGY
VIEW TECHNOLOGY
[Significantly Oxis is looking at such areas as] Aviation, Aerospace, Defence, Electric Vehicles, Marine"
Very nice blog. This blog explains about the Lithium ion batteries for submarines. Keep sharing.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing such useful information. I really enjoyed while reading your article and it is good to know the latest updates. You can also visit this website. Comparison of UN38.3 and IEC62133 Standards; Analysis of UN3813 Standard Test Results & Causes
battery test standard
Such a great blog! So many unknown facts and explanation I've read here. Hope to see many more interesting articles like this by the author
ReplyDeleteVery nice blog to explain about the lithium ion batteries. Check out Godi Energy for them.