Australia has chosen not to participate in Exercise
MALABAR 2018. This is very likely due to Australia’s desire not to offend its largest trading
partner and regional strategic threat, China. Way back in 2007 I wrote a
MALABAR 2007 article for Newsweekly. In 2007 Australia did participate.
China is concerned MALABAR is just one manifestation of an informal "Quadrilateral" US/Japan/India/Australia alliance (or security dialogue) designed to contain Chinese military power in the Indian and Western Pacific oceans. China usually succeeds in dissuading Australia, the weakest member, from being fully active in the Quadrilateral.
2018 ARTICLE
Dinakar Peri
for The Hindu, June 5, 2018, reports from New Delhi
"War games to hone
anti-submarine skills
Malabar exercise from June 7 to 16. - The Navies of India, Japan and the U.S. will enhance
their anti-submarine warfare skills in this year’s Malabar naval war games to
be held off the coast of Guam [in the Western Pacific Ocean] from June 7 to 16.
For the first time in a Malabar exercise, all three
Navies are deploying their maritime reconnaissance (MR) aircraft to sharpen
those skills.
“Each side has aircraft which can lay sono buoys and we
will also monitor each other’s sono buoys. We will cross-attach people from all
three countries,” the Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, Vice-Admiral G. Ashok
Kumar, said.
While the Indian Navy is deploying a P-8I long-range MR
aircraft, the U.S. is deploying two P-8A aircraft and Japan is sending a
Kawasaki P-1 MR aircraft. In addition, Japan and the U.S. have anti-submarine
warfare helicopters on board their helicopter carrier JS Ise and aircraft
carrier USS Ronald Reagan,
respectively.
[So ships include:
India's Fleet Base East at Vishakhapatnam
- USS Ronald Reagan, Aegis class cruisers USS Antietam and Chancellorsville, some destroyers and
Los Angeles class submarine USS Pasadena (SSN-752), and
Akizuki class destroyer JS Fuyuzuki. For the very first time Japan is
deploying an (unnamed) Soryu
class submarine.]
...[Exercise MALABAR] began in 1992 as a bilateral naval exercise
between India and the US and has over the years increased in scope and
complexity with particular focus on ASW in view of increasing Chinese submarine
movement in the Indian Ocean under the garb of anti-piracy patrols."
Pete
Hi Pete
ReplyDeleteAccording to THE AUSTRALIAN, Australia intent returning to MALABAR and USA/Japan supported it but India refused [1].
JMSDF did not announce details of its divisions to participate in MALABAR 2018 yet.
[1] https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/defence/australia-fails-to-rejoin-indias-malabar-naval-drill/news-story/d6071a15ef39c3ca93e1d917cdf667ee
“Australia snubbed by India over naval exercises”, THE AUSTRALIAN, April 30, 2018, Primrose Riordan
Regards
Hi Pete
ReplyDeleteJMSDF announced details of forces to participate in MALABAR 2008 [1].
Destroyers (750 people): Ise, Fuyuzuki, Suzunami, five navalised aircrafts.
Submarine (80people): SS501 Soryu.
Air force (40people): Two P-1s.
[1]http://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/release/201806/20180607.pdf
Regards
[1]http://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/release/201806/20180607.pdf
Regards
Hi Pete
ReplyDeleteJMSDF announced details of forces to participate in MALABAR 2008 [1].
Destroyers (750 people): Ise, Fuyuzuki, Suzunami, five navalised aircrafts.
Submarine (80people): SS501 Soryu.
Air force (40people): Two P-1s.
[1]http://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/release/201806/20180607.pdf
Regards
Things have not changed much then in the past decade, Australia still gets cold feet on Indo Pacific even though the term was part of Australia's 2013 white paper?
ReplyDeleteNever mind the differences in the definition of Indo Pacific between countries. As articulated back in 2007 by India and Japan, Indo Pacific stretches from the shores of east Africa to the shores of East Asia. Lately PM Modi defines it as from East Africa to Western US with India being the linkage and SEA at the center.
While the US means by Indo Pacific from India to US, although lately the US has been destroying the alliances it created or helped created after WW2.
It is obvious China is doing very well on its divide and conquer while no one could articulate forcefully at the latest SLD as to what is the price to be paid for militarizing the SCS.
KQN