February 11, 2020

Russian/Italian Joint Venture? S1000 Submarines? for Qatar?

PressTV, February 9, 2020 reports:

"Qatar is reportedly expected to acquire submarines from Italy and turn into the first Persian Gulf Arab country to operate those watercrafts.

The American business magazine Forbes reported that a new memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Italian company Fincantieri, Europe's largest shipbuilder, covers the “supply of cutting-edge naval vessels and submarines” to the Qatari Emiri Navy.


"Qatar may become the first Arab Persian Gulf state to operate submarines," the report said, adding that currently Iran is the only submarine operator in the Persian Gulf.
According to the report, the Qatari submarines, which are likely to be relatively small light ones, may be part of a much larger 5-billion-euro deal with Italy which was agreed in 2017.
...It further said that Saudi Arabia and the UAE, two of Qatar’s neighbors embroiled in a diplomatic crisis with Doha, have both stated needs to acquire submarines.
"Qatar has difficult relations these countries so the submarine acquisition could be seen, at least in part, as a response to these moves," the report added. [Pete Comment - oddly Qatar, which sits in the Persian Gulf, enjoys good relations with Iran.]

See H I Sutton's original Forbes article, of  February 4, 2020:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/hisutton/2020/02/04/qatars-massive-naval-expansion-to-include-submarines/#200f905b322e.

Pete Comment

Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri joint builds with TKMS of Germany the Type 212A/Todaro class  conventional subs.   

Fincantieri is apparently joint marketing with Russia's ROSOBORONEXPORT (with RUBIN Design Bureau as the joint builder) a smaller 1,000 - 1,100 ton concept submarine,  known as the "S1000" (see artwork with specifications below). 

S1000's "TECHNICAL INFORMATION"  section indicates the S1000 can be fitted with an Air Independent Propulsion "AIP capability (Fuel cell based) 200 kW".

As Italy is a NATO country, with access to high submarine tech, the idea of Fincantieri joint marketing with Russia the S1000 (which could be fitted with the Fuel Cell AIP system (designed in Germany? Still holding German intellectual property rights?) might be problematic.

Russian industry (in the Kilo sub ) has been unable to develop an AIP systems to compete with those of Western firms. Russia would find AIP in its Russian Navy Lada submarines to be strategically useful against the West. If Russia could at last incorporate Western AIP into its long awaited, but so far not exported, Amur 1650 and smaller Amur 950 submarines, such Russian exports could represent $Billions lost by Russia's Western submarine competitors.

Possibly Fincantieri might build much smaller submarines for Qatar (Italy has a long history building small subs) without any AIP tech/Russia complications. 


The S1000 concept submarine being marketed by Russia and Italy's Fincantieri (can include AIP).
(Artwork and specs courtesy Fincantieri)
--- 

Pete

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Pete,

It seems that Canada does have problems with keeping their submarines up to date.

Canada's submarine fleet spent 'zero days' at sea last year: government documents

"All four of Canada's submarines were tied up last year for repairs and maintenance — news that has the opposition Conservatives questioning whether the Liberal government can keep the second-hand fleet afloat for another two decades.

In response to a written question before Parliament, the Department of National Defence said the boats "spent zero days at sea" in 2019, but three of the four would return to service at some point this year.

Over the year, HMCS Victoria, HMCS Windsor, HMCS Chicoutimi and HMCS Corner Brook were in various stages of repair and maintenance. They also went into drydock for long-term upgrades meant to ensure the submarines remain operational until the end of the next decade."


"The bulk of the cash went to repairing HMCS Corner Brook, which has been undergoing an extended upgrade since 2015 following an accident four years earlier when it smashed into the bottom of the ocean off British Columbia. The boat is one of the three Canadian subs expected to be back in the water this year for "contractor trials" meant to confirm the repairs."

/Kjell

Pete said...

Hi /Kjell

See my response here https://gentleseas.blogspot.com/2020/02/reducing-collinsvictoria-rust-trend-for.html

Regards

Pete

Anonymous said...

I don’t see any particular problem with the Russian involvement, provided the sub is actually built in Italy with non Russian electronics. If it’s a Russian designed hull with Italian insides,, then it becomes somewhat like OMT in UK’s Team 31. I notice in the supplied specs, that no mention of any brand names is given anywhere. You would normally expect a listing like MTU or MAN engines etc.

Pete said...

Hi Anonymous

I think to coordinate (even a computer or paper design) with the Russians the Italians must have given the Russians information.

So, it mainly depends on whether Russian involvement gave Russian designers access to Italian (or German) submarine and Siemans AIP designs/software/hardware.

eg. much more than this https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/public.1535009488.28615cde70250d0e81b68ba466bd77d7f5c68c73.sinavy-pem-fuel-cells.pdf

Regards

Pete